1911 4" vs 5" barrell

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

Skiprr
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6458
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: Outskirts of Houston

Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell

#16

Post by Skiprr »

Excaliber wrote:They're surprisingly easy to shoot. My 3" Kimber Ultra Carry almost always surprises folks who try it because the recoil is not at all uncomfortable or difficult to manage.
:iagree: I use 230 gr. +P Ranger SD rounds, and though snappier than standard 230 gr. FMJ practice rounds, the load is still not uncomfortable at all, even one-handed, in my 3-inch Kimber.
Rugerboy50 wrote:A co worker says to truly appreciate a 1911 you have to get a 5" barrel 1st.
I didn't own any 1911-format pistols that weren't 5-inch barrels until 2007, so I kinda know where your purist friend is coming from. However, I think your purchase needs to be purpose-driven. If you want a carry pistol and don't think you want to carry a full-size 1911, then you may be really happy with a 5-inch as a range gun, but it may get left behind as a daily carry in favor of something smaller. If you're wanting something suitable for NRA pistol competition, a 5-inch with an adjustable rear sight will be better.

But as someone else said, 1911s are like potato chips: even with best intentions otherwise, once you have one, you'll want another. ;-)
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell

#17

Post by Excaliber »

Skiprr wrote:
Excaliber wrote:They're surprisingly easy to shoot. My 3" Kimber Ultra Carry almost always surprises folks who try it because the recoil is not at all uncomfortable or difficult to manage.
:iagree: I use 230 gr. +P Ranger SD rounds, and though snappier than standard 230 gr. FMJ practice rounds, the load is still not uncomfortable at all, even one-handed, in my 3-inch Kimber.
Rugerboy50 wrote:A co worker says to truly appreciate a 1911 you have to get a 5" barrel 1st.
I didn't own any 1911-format pistols that weren't 5-inch barrels until 2007, so I kinda know where your purist friend is coming from. However, I think your purchase needs to be purpose-driven. If you want a carry pistol and don't think you want to carry a full-size 1911, then you may be really happy with a 5-inch as a range gun, but it may get left behind as a daily carry in favor of something smaller. If you're wanting something suitable for NRA pistol competition, a 5-inch with an adjustable rear sight will be better.

But as someone else said, 1911s are like potato chips: even with best intentions otherwise, once you have one, you'll want another. ;-)
I very much agree with Skiprr here. The 5" 1911's are a pure pleasure to shoot, and are fine for uniformed duty carry for LEO's.

My first 1911 was a 5" and I carried it extensively off duty. However, the size and weight of that envelope require more accommodations than I choose to make for daily carry today, so I favor the shorter barrels for that purpose.

Each to his or her own, and YMMV.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.

rm9792
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell

#18

Post by rm9792 »

That is a good point about the shorter grip in the 3 inch. That is the only thing i dont care for. I have toyed with the idea of a 3 inch slide on commander frame.
User avatar

Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell

#19

Post by Pawpaw »

Kimber now offers a full length grip on a few of their Ultras (3" barrel). They call them "Ultra+".

http://www.kimberamerica.com/1911/cdp-i ... lus-cdp-ii
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams

Topic author
Rugerboy50
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 300
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:00 am
Location: Friendswood

Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell

#20

Post by Rugerboy50 »

Think I'm starting to lean towards a Springfield Loaded 5" Parkerized finish for my 1st one.

It's not going to be a CC piece.

Great input from everyone so far.
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell

#21

Post by Excaliber »

Rugerboy50 wrote:Think I'm starting to lean towards a Springfield Loaded 5" Parkerized finish for my 1st one.

It's not going to be a CC piece.

Great input from everyone so far.
I have one of those and it's a nice shooting gun.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”