Not unless you can prove it.Renegade wrote:Seriously, I know for a FACT I read it maybe 10 years ago and ignored it.
Especially if you think it may have been stricken.
Moderator: carlson1
Under CHL you can carry a pistol, With the proper paperwork, you can carry a full auto weapon.Renegade wrote:I was hoping you would find it for me.Charles L. Cotton wrote:You may be right, but where is that in the Penal Code?Renegade wrote:You cannot carry a machine gun under auspices of CHL.
Chas.
Seriously, I know for a FACT I read it maybe 10 years ago and ignored it. Been looking recently and I cannot find it. I am now wondering if I read it in the original bill and it was stricken. I also remember in the original bill the sticker you had to put on your car. Do you remember that? That of course was stricken. I wish I could find the original bill or at least the original bill enrolled into law.
Well, you must be new to this law stuffru934 wrote:ya, thats what im lookin for....cold hard evidence of the sort. please share when an if you do look an succeed
I met a fellow about 20 years ago that had gone along with some folks that thought IRS tax collection could be defeated. The guy i met was about a week out of prison, after serving 5 years, iirc. His advice on the subject was "Don't listen to them." point taken...I heard that there is no actual law on the books that requires us to pay federal income tax. I know its the norm to do so and all, but is it actually a law? If so, how do these crackpot groups come up with their argument.
I do remember the car sticker now that you mention it. There was a lot of goofy stuff in several of the failed bills. I have most of the old CHL bills and my analysis reports going back several years in my long-term storage so I may have to pull some of them and just post a few of the funny/interesting proposals that were proposed and defeated. Some of the “discussions� were hilarious - like the one about the 30.06 sign requirements!Renegade wrote:I am now wondering if I read it in the original bill and it was stricken. I also remember in the original bill the sticker you had to put on your car. Do you remember that? That of course was stricken. I wish I could find the original bill or at least the original bill enrolled into law.
That's why we have web sites, for information of interest to a smaller group of readers.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I should pull my files and write a book about the CHL saga in Texas, but there's a problem. There would only be a handful of people who would be interested,...
I'm curious to know what they charged him with. I'm sure you didn't ask, but I would like to know if the charge is "Failure to pay Federal Income Tax", or if they were brought up on charges of "Attempting to undermine a Federal collections agency"(or something like that ).lrb111 wrote:I met a fellow about 20 years ago that had gone along with some folks that thought IRS tax collection could be defeated. The guy i met was about a week out of prison, after serving 5 years, iirc. His advice on the subject was "Don't listen to them." point taken...I heard that there is no actual law on the books that requires us to pay federal income tax. I know its the norm to do so and all, but is it actually a law? If so, how do these crackpot groups come up with their argument.
In the early 90s I carried a Beretta 92A for a few months (not in the US) hoping it would make a good anti-hijack gun, as an epidemic of on-the-road hijackings was going on then, the BGs attacking, then retreating over a nearby border for safety. A few well-placed rounds from my F-350 into a car alongside could make all the difference in the outcome of this scenario, which usually occurred at night. The 92A seemed that it might be potentially useful here, as it would fire single-shot, or three-round bursts. Unfortunately, it was the least accurate 9mm I'd ever seen in single-shot, and in burst, I couldn't hit the side of a barn with it. To this day, I can't think of anything the 92A would do particularly well, except make a lot of light and noise. In the end, I went back to the trusted G17 for carry, and a 12ga. for the car, a combination I still use today.G.C.Montgomery wrote: It's worth noting that machine pistols and some other smaller submachineguns were designed to fill a highly mission specific role.
Hey, sometimes making a lot of light and noise is all you need. I've been fortunate enough to never have the need for any of that sort of equipment. I know very few people, except SAW gunners and a limited few others, who have ever found a use for full-auto weapons of any kind.AV8R wrote:...To this day, I can't think of anything the 92A would do particularly well, except make a lot of light and noise. In the end, I went back to the trusted G17 for carry, and a 12ga. for the car, a combination I still use today.
Light and noise can be very upsetting, especially when completely unexpected. An old friend (Vietnam artillery sergeant) taught me his tried-and-true technique of opening up as soon as his sidearm cleared leather, which had shown good results for him in initiating course reversals among armed peasantry encountered on trails. I'm reluctant to bring this up, as it would be irresponsible to suggest that this kind of social introduction might be useful in a Walmart parking lot, but things are getting more dangerous around here all the time.G.C.Montgomery wrote::lol: Hey, sometimes making a lot of light and noise is all you need. I've been fortunate enough to never have the need for any of that sort of equipment. I know very few people, except SAW gunners and a limited few others, who have ever found a use for full-auto weapons of any kind.AV8R wrote:...To this day, I can't think of anything the 92A would do particularly well, except make a lot of light and noise. In the end, I went back to the trusted G17 for carry, and a 12ga. for the car, a combination I still use today.