Our children are so uneducated.mojo84 wrote:http://youtu.be/SDlSVE0X3Ao
I'd like to see Mr. Crowder interview the students from Florida so they could demonstrate their total lack of facts.
Moderator: carlson1
Our children are so uneducated.mojo84 wrote:http://youtu.be/SDlSVE0X3Ao
I've been a member since Feb 2016, but didn't remember. Yep, same username.AndyC wrote:Same - joined as AndyC there too.bblhd672 wrote:I've signed up at full30. https://www.full30.com/
I'm looking for a way to mass-download all my YouTube videos and host them at full30.
Umm, free speech only applies to the government. You tube can squash whatever they want and it doesn't violate anyone's rights.karder wrote:There is a huge amount of truly obscene material on YouTube that seems to be protected under the umbrella of "free speech". Unfortunately, for the left, "free speech" only includes what they agree with.
Their platform their rules.anygunanywhere wrote:Umm, free speech only applies to the government. You tube can squash whatever they want and it doesn't violate anyone's rights.karder wrote:There is a huge amount of truly obscene material on YouTube that seems to be protected under the umbrella of "free speech". Unfortunately, for the left, "free speech" only includes what they agree with.
Not necessarily. Just imagine the lawsuits if they decided to ban videos about Islam, ANTIFA, BLM, or most any other civil right.bblhd672 wrote:Their platform their rules.anygunanywhere wrote:Umm, free speech only applies to the government. You tube can squash whatever they want and it doesn't violate anyone's rights.karder wrote:There is a huge amount of truly obscene material on YouTube that seems to be protected under the umbrella of "free speech". Unfortunately, for the left, "free speech" only includes what they agree with.
Sure, I understand that. Yet the banner of "free speech", though not entirely applicable, is exactly what YouTube cloaks itself in when allowing content that would have been considered obscene just a couple of decades ago. They are free to allow or disallow whatever they like, but lacking the courage of their convictions, they usually invoke "free speech" arguments. I am simply using the language of the left.anygunanywhere wrote:Umm, free speech only applies to the government. You tube can squash whatever they want and it doesn't violate anyone's rights.karder wrote:There is a huge amount of truly obscene material on YouTube that seems to be protected under the umbrella of "free speech". Unfortunately, for the left, "free speech" only includes what they agree with.
I'm sure the 9th circuit would find a way to rule that unconstitutional.Pawpaw wrote:Not necessarily. Just imagine the lawsuits if they decided to ban videos about Islam, ANTIFA, BLM, or most any other civil right.bblhd672 wrote:Their platform their rules.anygunanywhere wrote:Umm, free speech only applies to the government. You tube can squash whatever they want and it doesn't violate anyone's rights.karder wrote:There is a huge amount of truly obscene material on YouTube that seems to be protected under the umbrella of "free speech". Unfortunately, for the left, "free speech" only includes what they agree with.