The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:17 pm
The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
Open carry activists not so open about criminal past - http://www.star-telegram.com/opinion/op ... 43031.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
I don't know Bud Kennedy's politics. Kory Watkins has a little more acne on his permanent record than I thought.
I don't know Bud Kennedy's politics. Kory Watkins has a little more acne on his permanent record than I thought.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
- Location: Richardson, TX
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
The very reason that licensing is important.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 9316
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
- Location: Arlington
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
Exactly!baldeagle wrote:The very reason that licensing is important.
![I Agree :iagree:](./images/smilies/iagree.gif)
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 11203
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
- Location: Pineywoods of east Texas
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
Absolutely!joe817 wrote:Exactly!baldeagle wrote:The very reason that licensing is important.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 7877
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
For a right? I disagree. Are citizens of other states that require no license more ethical and law abiding than Texans?Oldgringo wrote:Absolutely!joe817 wrote:Exactly!baldeagle wrote:The very reason that licensing is important.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2296
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:49 pm
- Location: North Ft Worth(Alliance area)
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
anygunanywhere wrote:For a right? I disagree. Are citizens of other states that require no license more ethical and law abiding than Texans?Oldgringo wrote:Absolutely!joe817 wrote:Exactly!baldeagle wrote:The very reason that licensing is important.
![I Agree :iagree:](./images/smilies/iagree.gif)
21-Apr-09 filed online
05-Sep-09 Plastic Arrived
09-Sep-13 Plastic Arrived
21-june-18 Plasic Arrived
05-Sep-09 Plastic Arrived
09-Sep-13 Plastic Arrived
21-june-18 Plasic Arrived
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:17 pm
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
The terrible thing is I agree with some of what that idiot spews. I believe I have a Constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
I would consider praying to my Maker that nothing I did would ever approach the social unease this guy causes, but it would be a waste of the Great Architect's ear. Nothing, absolutely nothing, would make me carry a firearm in an unreasonable way intended to cause peaceful fellow citizens to feel endangered.
It's a gun safety issue, if nothing else. If I display a weapon in an aggressive way, then... Ah, forget it. It's all so stinkin' obvious. Those who have no respect for what a firearm means have no business carrying them.
Constitutional rights are at the mercy of due process, and they are also properly restrained by appropriate responsibility.
I would consider praying to my Maker that nothing I did would ever approach the social unease this guy causes, but it would be a waste of the Great Architect's ear. Nothing, absolutely nothing, would make me carry a firearm in an unreasonable way intended to cause peaceful fellow citizens to feel endangered.
It's a gun safety issue, if nothing else. If I display a weapon in an aggressive way, then... Ah, forget it. It's all so stinkin' obvious. Those who have no respect for what a firearm means have no business carrying them.
Constitutional rights are at the mercy of due process, and they are also properly restrained by appropriate responsibility.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
- Location: Richardson, TX
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
Can you yell fire in a crowded theatre? No right is absolute.anygunanywhere wrote:For a right? I disagree. Are citizens of other states that require no license more ethical and law abiding than Texans?Oldgringo wrote:Absolutely!joe817 wrote:Exactly!baldeagle wrote:The very reason that licensing is important.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:24 pm
- Location: Marshall
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
Am I missing something? A Class A misdemeanor is only disqualifying for 5 years, right? His conviction was in 2000. If he's still ineligible, there has to be something else.
NRA lifetime member
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
You're right.KC5AV wrote:Am I missing something? A Class A misdemeanor is only disqualifying for 5 years, right? His conviction was in 2000. If he's still ineligible, there has to be something else.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 7877
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
I did not say rights are absolute. Licensing a right thereby giving permission to exercise the right sets the precedent for licensing all rights. As we so often state, these requirements we go through to carry do nothing to prevent those inclined to break the law from carrying. The clowns we all know and love who have sullied the OC debate are prime examples. Embracing the status quo and not advancing our RKBA because someone will break the law is absurd.baldeagle wrote:Can you yell fire in a crowded theatre? No right is absolute.anygunanywhere wrote:For a right? I disagree. Are citizens of other states that require no license more ethical and law abiding than Texans?Oldgringo wrote:Absolutely!joe817 wrote:Exactly!baldeagle wrote:The very reason that licensing is important.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
I'll give you no argument baldeagle but am interested in your ideas on the subject ?baldeagle wrote:Can you yell fire in a crowded theatre? No right is absolute.anygunanywhere wrote:For a right? I disagree. Are citizens of other states that require no license more ethical and law abiding than Texans?Oldgringo wrote:Absolutely!joe817 wrote:Exactly!baldeagle wrote:The very reason that licensing is important.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:03 am
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
Poor reporting IMO. The article says:
Seems as though they intentionally led people to believe he is currently ineligible for a CHL, but don't have any proof to back that up.Depending on his other misdemeanors, Watkins might be eligible by now or in another state. Mostly, though, he has said that he considers licenses an unjust interference with what he calls his “God-given rights.”
Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/opinion/op ... rylink=cpy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
Schumer’s False Firebaldeagle wrote:Can you yell fire in a crowded theatre? No right is absolute.
This fire-in-a-theater jazz is a favorite of the less historically literate among America’s false-compromisers, most of whom know neither that the phrase was a (defective) analogy and not a legal doctrine, nor that the case from which it comes was subsequently overturned with some prejudice.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 9316
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
- Location: Arlington
Re: The Star Telegram on OCTC - nothing new, really
I believe he reset the clock when he & his wife were arrested back in September. Interfering with duties of a police officer IIRC. More info here:KC5AV wrote:Am I missing something? A Class A misdemeanor is only disqualifying for 5 years, right? His conviction was in 2000. If he's still ineligible, there has to be something else.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=74270&p=935167&hili ... ns#p935167" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380