HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

This sub-forum will open for posting on Sept. 1, 2012.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Do you support reducing the 10 hr. CHL course to between 4 to 6 hours, excluding range time??

I support HB47 and I am not a CHL Instructor
90
66%
I support HB47 and I am a CHL Instructor
25
18%
I oppose HB47 and I am not a CHL Instructor
20
15%
I oppose HB47 and I am a CHL Instructor
2
1%
 
Total votes: 137


RKirkwood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 212
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#46

Post by RKirkwood »

I'm for the reduction but the instructor has a major impact on the course. My instructor main gave us a sales pitch for CHL as a course. Everyone passed but a friend who took it with me still struggles with what's the law. I mention on this board how disappointed I was with my instructor and course and several offer to let me sit in their class (Thanks Justin). The difference was amazing I walked out with a lot of useful information.

My point is if the course is reduced in hours it needs to be more set or if it is set then audited better. I understand instructor don't want more government oversight but not everyone is at the top of their game.

:tiphat: to those who do their best
User avatar

Crossfire
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 5404
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
Location: DFW
Contact:

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#47

Post by Crossfire »

I am with you on that one. I strongly feel that if DPS truly wanted to improve the program, they would be auditing the CLASSES, not the paperwork.
Texas LTC Instructor, FFL, IdentoGO Fingerprinting Partner
http://www.Crossfire-Training.com
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#48

Post by jmra »

Sure wish we could get more members to chime in. I don't understand the lack of responses to polls on the forum.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

troglodyte
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:16 pm
Location: Hockley County
Contact:

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#49

Post by troglodyte »

jmra wrote:Sure wish we could get more members to chime in. I don't understand the lack of responses to polls on the forum.
I haven't voted because I'm not sure where I stand on this. Ten hours is a long time but I find that I still feel cramped at getting in the info I think we are supposed to teach. I don't have a lot of fluff and stuff and not much time is spent on hypothetical "what-ifs". As a vertern school teacher I understand how to manage a class, not that I always do it well, but I don't let it get out of hand.

My question is what will be required and what will be cut?

I don't necessarily oppose a 4 or 6 hour course (+range) but if I still have to teach the same info in a shorter time then I don't know how I will do it short of speed reading it off of a PowerPoint slide.
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#50

Post by jmra »

troglodyte wrote:
jmra wrote:Sure wish we could get more members to chime in. I don't understand the lack of responses to polls on the forum.
I haven't voted because I'm not sure where I stand on this. Ten hours is a long time but I find that I still feel cramped at getting in the info I think we are supposed to teach. I don't have a lot of fluff and stuff and not much time is spent on hypothetical "what-ifs". As a vertern school teacher I understand how to manage a class, not that I always do it well, but I don't let it get out of hand.

My question is what will be required and what will be cut?

I don't necessarily oppose a 4 or 6 hour course (+range) but if I still have to teach the same info in a shorter time then I don't know how I will do it short of speed reading it off of a PowerPoint slide.
What info do you omit when teaching the renewal? Is there a different curriculum requirement for for initial vs renewal? As far as I could tell it was the same info just less time.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member

Ameer
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#51

Post by Ameer »

jmra wrote:Is there a different curriculum requirement for for initial vs renewal? As far as I could tell it was the same info just less time.
My renewal class was the afternoon half of an initial class.
I believe the basic political division in this country is not between liberals and conservatives but between those who believe that they should have a say in the personal lives of strangers and those who do not.

Ameer
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#52

Post by Ameer »

Crossfire wrote:I am with you on that one. I strongly feel that if DPS truly wanted to improve the program, they would be auditing the CLASSES, not the paperwork.
like.png
like.png (6.28 KiB) Viewed 1326 times
I believe the basic political division in this country is not between liberals and conservatives but between those who believe that they should have a say in the personal lives of strangers and those who do not.
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#53

Post by jmra »

Ameer wrote:
jmra wrote:Is there a different curriculum requirement for for initial vs renewal? As far as I could tell it was the same info just less time.
My renewal class was the afternoon half of an initial class.
Mine also. From talking to my friend who did his initial in the same class I did my renewal, the instructor recapped everything they had covered in the morning just in much less detail.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#54

Post by sjfcontrol »

jmra wrote:
troglodyte wrote:
jmra wrote:Sure wish we could get more members to chime in. I don't understand the lack of responses to polls on the forum.
I haven't voted because I'm not sure where I stand on this. Ten hours is a long time but I find that I still feel cramped at getting in the info I think we are supposed to teach. I don't have a lot of fluff and stuff and not much time is spent on hypothetical "what-ifs". As a vertern school teacher I understand how to manage a class, not that I always do it well, but I don't let it get out of hand.

My question is what will be required and what will be cut?

I don't necessarily oppose a 4 or 6 hour course (+range) but if I still have to teach the same info in a shorter time then I don't know how I will do it short of speed reading it off of a PowerPoint slide.
What info do you omit when teaching the renewal? Is there a different curriculum requirement for for initial vs renewal? As far as I could tell it was the same info just less time.
No, there is a difference between the requirements for a new v.s. renewal license.

GC 411.188(b) states (for a new license):
(b) Only a qualified handgun instructor may administer a handgun proficiency course. The handgun proficiency course must include at least 10 hours and not more than 15 hours of instruction on:
(1) the laws that relate to weapons and to the use of deadly force;
(2) handgun use, proficiency, and safety;
(3) nonviolent dispute resolution; and
(4) proper storage practices for handguns with an emphasis on
storage practices that eliminate the possibility of accidental injury to a child.
Whereas GC 411.188(c) states (for a renewal):
(c) The department by rule shall develop a continuing education course in handgun proficiency for a license holder who wishes to renew a license. Only a qualified handgun instructor may administer the continuing education course. The course must include:
(1) at least four hours of instruction on one or more of the subjects listed in Subsection (b); and
Note the "one or more" of the subjects for renewal, but all of the subjects for a new license.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#55

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

jmra wrote:
Ameer wrote:
jmra wrote:Is there a different curriculum requirement for for initial vs renewal? As far as I could tell it was the same info just less time.
My renewal class was the afternoon half of an initial class.
Mine also. From talking to my friend who did his initial in the same class I did my renewal, the instructor recapped everything they had covered in the morning just in much less detail.
That's the way I handle my classes. Renewal students must be in class by 1:00pm, but they can attend all day if they wish. I cover Use of Force after the range work, then before the test I do a class review. Although the Code doesn't require covering everything in renewal classes, the DPS test is the same for new and renewal students. Therefore, we have to cover everything to get renewal students ready for the test.

I cover Use of Force after renewal students arrive because I want them to get the entire presentation and discussion.

Chas.

longtooth
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 12329
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Angelina County

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#56

Post by longtooth »

My outline of the day too.
Image
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
Post Reply

Return to “2013 Texas Legislative Session”