OC v CHL
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 220
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:56 pm
- Location: Heartland,TX
Re: OC v CHL
Let me again say this is the best forum concerning our 2A. I have looked at others not even in the same ballpark as this one. Folks on here are able to express opinions useing the proper guidelines. If you have a question or need help in an area people on here will try to assist. I enjoy this forum very much being able to see what others have to say & think on our 2A along with many other gun related topics doesn't mean we agree on everything also doesn't mean we're fighting just expressing our thoughts on these subjects. Thanks Charles & other senior members for all y'all do.
cw3van
Retired LEO
NRA Life Member, TSRA Life Member,
Retired LEO
NRA Life Member, TSRA Life Member,
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1769
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:19 pm
Re: OC v CHL
MasterOfNone wrote:Technically, both OC and CC would affect every licensee, they would all be able to legally _____. But the practical question of which would BENEFIT the most people can only be determined by asking all of them. Personally, I am not a student but I would be more likely to carry on a campus than to OC.
I'm not a student either and would be unlikely to OC very often (although I would like it as an option). But I think that Campus Carry would benefit more CHLs than OC would. I'd like to see both Campus Carry and OC pass this year provided there are good bills for each and NO modifications to 30.06. But if only one can pass, then it really should be Campus Carry.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:28 pm
- Location: Almost to the goat lovers!
Re: OC v CHL
My original comment was aimed at people who are only willing to support pro-gun legislation that effect them only. Is campus carry going to effect me at this point in time? No. But I'm going to support it anyway because it expands the pro-gun communities rights. I believe we need to be united in all our efforts. What "disturbs" me is the people who don't think this way.Charles L. Cotton wrote:It's clear you aren't going to answer the question and we both know why.johnferg69 wrote:Maybe for the same reason you know I've posted there.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I'm talking about the OpenCarry.org and the overall attitude expressed by its posters/members, just as I said. If TexasCHLforum "disturbs" you, how can you read or post there?johnferg69 wrote:Are you referring to the 2 threads there since my Jan '13 join date were I've questioned Rep. Lavenders OC bill and commented it needed work?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Then how do you stomach Opencarry.org? You post there and virtually everyone sees open-carry as an issue that everyone should support regardless of how horrible a particular bill may be. Everyone who expresses any concerns are ridiculed. Opencarry.org wants everyone to band together to push for open-carry to the exclusion of anything and everything else, regardless of potential unintended consequences.johnferg69 wrote:tbrown wrote:I'm disappointed at seeing another attempt to get pro gun people to fight against each other instead of fighting together to defeat the anti gun enemies.
That is exactly what disturbs me when I visit this forum. Instead of everyone banning together to expand our gun rights we pick what's important to us and throw the others under the bus.
Why the double standard for TexasCHLforum.com and Opencarry.org?
Chas.
Chas.
Chas.
Now, about opencarry.org. You quizzed me about it so I'll give you a more thorough answer. I've never mentioned it on this forum, you have repeatedly. I went to see what all the hoopla was about since it gets mentioned so often. I read, I posted on 2 (two) threads questioning Rep. Lavenders bill and never went back till you questioned me on it. I wasn't over there commenting on this forum, anyone on it or you. Why you felt the need to target and question me in this is beyond me. Just because I posted on a forum you don't like that makes me an evil agent with ulterior motives? Given your questioning you must think so.
Yes, I'm for OC. And yes, I'm urged people to support it but I've stated several times on this forum that I want a responsible OC bill. If that makes me a fringe OC kook that has no place on your forum so be it!
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: OC v CHL
You need to reread your post about why coming to "this forum" disturbs you and my question as to how you can stomach OpenCarry.org that actually is guilty of what you falsely accused TexasCHLforum Members of doing. Until now, all you done is respond to my question with snide, cryptic comments. Now you want to play the victim.johnferg69 wrote: My original comment was aimed at people who are only willing to support pro-gun legislation that effect them only. Is campus carry going to effect me at this point in time? No. But I'm going to support it anyway because it expands the pro-gun communities rights. I believe we need to be united in all our efforts. What "disturbs" me is the people who don't think this way.
Now, about opencarry.org. You quizzed me about it so I'll give you a more thorough answer. I've never mentioned it on this forum, you have repeatedly. I went to see what all the hoopla was about since it gets mentioned so often. I read, I posted on 2 (two) threads questioning Rep. Lavenders bill and never went back till you questioned me on it. I wasn't over there commenting on this forum, anyone on it or you. Why you felt the need to target and question me in this is beyond me. Just because I posted on a forum you don't like that makes me an evil agent with ulterior motives? Given your questioning you must think so.
Yes, I'm for OC. And yes, I'm urged people to support it but I've stated several times on this forum that I want a responsible OC bill. If that makes me a fringe OC kook that has no place on your forum so be it!
TexasCHLforum Members have differing opinions about open-carry and no one is ridiculed or attacked. That's hardly the case on OpenCarry.org, yet you haven't cautioned those folks about supporting only open-carry and "throw[ing]the others under the buss" as you expressly stated we do here on the Forum. You have a place here on the Forum, regardless of your position on any gun issue. Falsely accusing our Members of being single-minded and "throwing others under the buss" isn't so welcome.
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2099
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 9:19 pm
- Location: Houston Northwest
Re: OC v CHL
RottenApple wrote:MasterOfNone wrote:Technically, both OC and CC would affect every licensee, they would all be able to legally _____. But the practical question of which would BENEFIT the most people can only be determined by asking all of them. Personally, I am not a student but I would be more likely to carry on a campus than to OC.
I'm not a student either and would be unlikely to OC very often (although I would like it as an option). But I think that Campus Carry would benefit more CHLs than OC would. I'd like to see both Campus Carry and OC pass this year provided there are good bills for each and NO modifications to 30.06. But if only one can pass, then it really should be Campus Carry.
I would most likely not OC even if it were passed, MWAG calls are not something I want to have to deal with in Houston, even if it was legal, you can bet that they'll happen.
However, I do spent time on College Campuses for various reasons.
I would prefer to be able to carry MORE places, concealed, than LESS places, openly.
That's really the overall crux of the argument.
IANAL, YMMV, ITEOTWAWKI and all that.
Re: School events, NOT on school property
Re: Parking Lots, 30.06, and MPA
Re: School events, NOT on school property
Re: Parking Lots, 30.06, and MPA
Re: OC v CHL
I would prefer to have more choices about where and how I exercise my right to keep and bear arms without arbitrary and unconstitutional infringing. We wouldnt have to pick and choose what rights we get back if Texans cared enough to elect pro gun legislators.
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:20 pm
- Location: Round Rock, TX
Re: OC v CHL
Former TSgt USAF Security Forces
Iraq Vet
Iraq Vet
Re: OC v CHL
My sentiments exactlysnatchel wrote:I look at it like this:
If open carry fails, nothing really changes. I can still carry concealed--unless i'm on a campus. While I don't gain anything, I certainly don't lose anything.
If campus carry fails, nothing really changes. I can still carry concealed--unless i'm on a campus. I don't gain anything, but I lose the option to carry when i'm on campus.
I'm trying to look at the bigger picture. Campus carry affects more people personally, myself included. As much as I would love to open carry at times, i'd rather be able to concealed carry on campus all the time.
Application, Fingerprints & CHL class done by 1-12-13
All documents mailed USPS 1-16-13
All Documents Received, background check under review 2-1-13
Background check complete 2/15
All documents mailed USPS 1-16-13
All Documents Received, background check under review 2-1-13
Background check complete 2/15
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 9655
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
- Location: Allen, Texas
Re: OC v CHL
We would like to have both pass. Then, I can open carry at BBQ parties.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
Re: OC v CHL
Only if the engraving is gold inlayed with a few precious stones mounted foe additional effect.Beiruty wrote:We would like to have both pass. Then, I can open carry at BBQ parties.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 9655
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
- Location: Allen, Texas
Re: OC v CHL
Will this pass your acid-test?MeMelYup wrote:Only if the engraving is gold inlayed with a few precious stones mounted foe additional effect.Beiruty wrote:We would like to have both pass. Then, I can open carry at BBQ parties.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3509
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
- Location: Alvin
- Contact:
Re: OC v CHL
DANG! I"D OC that!!!!
(or the lilac LC9 I would love to find)
(or the lilac LC9 I would love to find)
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:14 pm
Re: OC v CHL
Ok, it's been a couple of months since this thread started, and it looks like (to me anyway) we may not get open or campus carry this time around. So, tell me, what did we gain this session?
7.30.08 -- Plastic in hand (99 days)
04.01.18--2nd Renewal
05.05.18-- Plastic
04.01.18--2nd Renewal
05.05.18-- Plastic
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
- Location: Ellis County
Re: OC v CHL
Insight.baseballguy2001 wrote:Ok, it's been a couple of months since this thread started, and it looks like (to me anyway) we may not get open or campus carry this time around. So, tell me, what did we gain this session?
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 9655
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
- Location: Allen, Texas
Re: OC v CHL
most like nothing for gun rights, maybe 4hrs instead of 10hrs for the CHL course.baseballguy2001 wrote:Ok, it's been a couple of months since this thread started, and it looks like (to me anyway) we may not get open or campus carry this time around. So, tell me, what did we gain this session?
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member