Javier730 wrote:VMI77 wrote:So if one of us not a LEO responded in the same way would we get a pass or be charged with assault? If a woman spits on me can I punch her and not be charged with assault? How about say the police have just arrested some woman and cuffed her....she was drunk and ran into my vehicle...and as she was being led away spit on me....could I punch her without being charged with assault?
Spitting is assault and you should be able to stop an assault with force but whats legal and whats fair are two different things.
My point is simple. If it would be a crime to punch someone under the same or similar conditions for one of us mundanes, then it should be a crime when a LEO does it too. The punishment should be the same, although I think one could make a pretty good argument that a trained law enforcement officer with the power to arrest people should have more restraint than Joe Sixpack, and thus, should be punished more severely.
Now, if it's not going to be a crime for one of us mundanes, and you want to make the case that punching someone with their hands restrained by cuffs, plastic ties, rope, etc., is a justified response to being spat on, then let the punching begin. However, while I understand the inclination, at least when said person is not in restraints, I don't think it's a particularly good idea....I just prefer not to have a country with a class of overlords who get to dispense violence and a class of peons who may only have it dispensed upon them. IOW, I think everyone should be accountable for their behavior, not just us peons.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com