TSA gets one right, Gun parts inside kids stuffed toy.

[philip964]

http://www.chron.com/news/article/Gun-p ... to-2913116" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Wow, the nerve to do this. Not what you think. Boy and Father later allowed to fly to their destination. Near as I can tell from the article. Mom packed the childs carry on and disassembled a gun and put parts inside each of three stuffed animals. I guess they are going through a divorce and she thought this might make the fathers day.

[Glock 23]

Yea, putting your ex and childs other parent in jail isn't real bright.

Alot of women out there would love for their childs father to be around, guess she wants the oppsite.

[VMI77]

http://www.chron.com/news/article/Gun-p ... to-2913116

Wow, the nerve to do this. Not what you think. Boy and Father later allowed to fly to their destination. Near as I can tell from the article. Mom packed the childs carry on and disassembled a gun and put parts inside each of three stuffed animals. I guess they are going through a divorce and she thought this might make the fathers day.

Color me skeptical. No names given, no identity of the spouse, and the TSA just took his word that he didn't know the gun parts were there? The same TSA that sent a couple of young Brits home as "terrorists" because they texted about their party plans? Is this guy, perchance, an employee of the TSA, or some other DHS department? Mmmmm? It seems mighty convenient to me that in the wake of all the negative publicity about searching children and grandmas, that someone decided to hide gun parts in a four year old's stuffed animals, and that the TSA took the word of the person they caught that he didn't know anything about it, and that the supposed perp, the wife, is not identified or arrested. But I guess it's not like the "Fast and Furious" administration would do anything deceitful or illegal in service of their agenda.

[mamabearCali]

Color me skeptical. No names given, no identity of the spouse, and the TSA just took his word that he didn't know the gun parts were there? The same TSA that sent a couple of young Brits home as "terrorists" because they texted about their party plans? Is this guy, perchance, an employee of the TSA, or some other DHS department? Mmmmm? It seems mighty convenient to me that in the wake of all the negative publicity about searching children and grandmas, that someone decided to hide gun parts in a four year old's stuffed animals, and that the TSA took the word of the person they caught that he didn't know anything about it, and that the supposed perp, the wife, is not identified or arrested. But I guess it's not like the "Fast and Furious" administration would do anything deceitful or illegal in service of their agenda.

This is my thoughts too.

[VMI77]

Color me skeptical. No names given, no identity of the spouse, and the TSA just took his word that he didn't know the gun parts were there? The same TSA that sent a couple of young Brits home as "terrorists" because they texted about their party plans? Is this guy, perchance, an employee of the TSA, or some other DHS department? Mmmmm? It seems mighty convenient to me that in the wake of all the negative publicity about searching children and grandmas, that someone decided to hide gun parts in a four year old's stuffed animals, and that the TSA took the word of the person they caught that he didn't know anything about it, and that the supposed perp, the wife, is not identified or arrested. But I guess it's not like the "Fast and Furious" administration would do anything deceitful or illegal in service of their agenda.

This is my thoughts too.

Yeah, and today, the very next day, we read that they took an 18 month old baby girl off a plane because she is on the "no-fly" list. Yet we're supposed to believe a guy is caught with a hidden gun, says his wife did it, and the TSA says, OK, no problem, have a nice trip? And TSA believing the "wife did it," yet no names given, no arrest? This doesn't pass the smell test. If this was a false flag op I suspect it will get about as much coverage from the Obama media as Fast and Furious, or The One's numerous direct violations of the law and US Constitution. And at the same time, note, the Criminal Holder is suing Sheriff Joe in Arizona, but can't be bothered with death threats by the Black Panthers, or someone like John Corazine, who openly stole some $2 BILLION. So, enforcing laws this criminal administration doesn't like demands a trial, but open fraud, theft, and solicitation of murder is OK, as long as you're cozy with the Obama Mafia. Has there ever been a more openly corrupt DOJ?