Katygunnut wrote:Death threats after shooting someone that is burglarizing your house? I am having trouble comprehending how any thinking person could come to the conclusion that someone should be killed because they used deadly force to protect themself. After all, if you are against the use of violence, then surely you wouldn't condone killing anyone.
Are these threats coming from people in general, or from members of the BG's gang / friends? If the latter, then this somewhat makes sense, although I am still having trouble figuring out why criminals would find it offensive that someone defended themselves. Wouldn't this just be considered an occupational hazard?
Maybe I am too sheltered.
I wouldn't at all put it past a rabid anti-gun/self-defense type to make death threats to a person who defended himself with a gun. The anti-gun crowd isn't generally against the use of violence, they're just against ordinary citizens using violence to defend themselves against predators. I don't believe they're all that upset about predators using violence against ordinary citizens, either --you're supposed to feel sorry for these poor predators who have been victimized by society. Some of these people simply have damaged brain circuits.
EDIT
I should have read the article linked to above before I commented. These predators tug at liberal heart strings and pull all the liberal and anti-gun-nutjob triggers:
1. They're step-brothers --warm fuzzies about "family."
2. They're under 18 years old --oh the poor children, they don't know any better.
3. They were just stealing a television --don't you know that the life of a "child" is more precious than a television?
4. The one killed was shot in the back --oh that is just so unfair, to shoot a "child" in the back like that, and over mere property.
5. These "children" were "unarmed" --Oh my God, the law allows you to shoot "children" just because they've broken into your house.
6. These people being robbed probably had all the advantages --the wife doesn't have to work and the husband is employed at the AF base. These poor children are the victims of society just trying to get by --what else are they supposed to do?
I hope everyone gets my dripping sarcasm. Don't you know that by liberal doctrine you're supposed to cower in your home, let the predators have whatever they want, and count on their mercy? That's how it works in the UK and there are a lot of people in this country that want it to work that way here. Given the circumstances the liberals must be coming unglued by the fact that the victim of these predators is not being prosecuted --at least not yet. The death threats make a lot more sense in this light.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com