Man shot while stealing car rims...
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:20 am
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/met ... 99891.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury
cubbyjg wrote:My only question would be, was the guy shot in the act or while running away? While i feel the owner is justified in either situation and the law covers him, i just hope the grand jury agrees.
According to the law, he is just as justified as if shot in the act if he had the wheels with him. I guess they need to prove when the guy was shot.(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and