It is indeed a form of intellectual dishonesty and escapism - adjusting one's understanding of fact to accommodate one's feelings.flintknapper wrote:"Excaliber" wrote:
No, I knew you weren't....I was just taking the opportunity to make a point.I'm not suggesting that everything has to be learned through personal experience - that's certainly not true.
Yup.You're certainly right that there's plenty of information about the true nature of criminals and the viciousness they're capable of available for anyone who bothers to so much as read the papers.
Its an amazing thing, but true!My point is that many people who have never come across a cold blooded psychopath cannot get their heads around the fact that these people exist and that they may very well encounter one in a life and death situation some day, regardless of how many crime blotter reports they read.
Exactly! "If I refuse to accept the facts...then I don't have to deal with them (emotionally)"It doesn't make logical sense to be that naive - but it does make emotional sense, which tends to overwhelm logic, and I've seen the phenomenon many times.
Another form of intellectual dishonesty IMO.
Like most infantile thinking, it only seems to work until its apparent success is demolished by an encounter with reality.