Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B


EEllis
Banned
Posts in topic: 47
Posts: 1888
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:54 pm

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#106

Post by EEllis »

It does come in several flavors
Image

apostate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:01 am

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#107

Post by apostate »

Perhaps they can't read cursive. ;-)

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#108

Post by Dave2 »

E.Marquez wrote:The item in question that caused ABC agents to believe that had cornered a criminal.
[ Image ]
Oh, yes, I can clearly see it says "Shiner" right there on the side...
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.

mamabearCali
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 2214
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#109

Post by mamabearCali »

These aren't beat cops.....these are supposed to be highly trained individuals.......surely they know most brands of beer. No one out of he seven said.....".wait......I've never heard of that beer.......hold on.....that's water!"

Surely such highly trained, amped up ATF agents would be better used elsewhere. Perhaps raids on the local sorority house. :banghead:
SAHM to four precious children. Wife to a loving husband.

"The women of this country learned long ago those without swords can still die upon them!" Eowyn in LOTR Two Towers
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#110

Post by baldeagle »

E.Marquez wrote:The item in question that caused ABC agents to believe that had cornered a criminal.
[ Image ]
Gasp! That looks JUST LIKE a Schiltz case!!!! How could they have possibly known that wasn't beer?????
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#111

Post by MasterOfNone »

EEllis wrote:
MasterOfNone wrote:
EEllis wrote:...see what they believed was a minor carrying what appeared to be a 12 pack of beer.
This is the problem I am having. What made them "believe it was beer? They obviously did not positively identify it, so what made them believe it was beer instead of water or soda? I suspect it was a preformed bias toward believing it.
This just sounds a lot like the citizen having to prove innocence.
they don't have to positively identify it as beer it just has to be reasonable to them that it is. We, the courts, don't require law enforcement to be positive before allowing them it investigate or initiate a stop. There been no hint, except from people who in absolutely no position to know, that there was anything wrong with the RS for this stop.

Just for those who don't know this particular brand of water is canned not bottled and does not use the primarily single color packaging that soda uses. While soda and beer are not the only items that come in 12 pack cans these would certainly not cause me to instinctively think water.
And they would not cause me to instinctively think "beer.". As I said, it appears to me they applied the "assume crime and make the citizen prove otherwise" approach. I suspect the same group would initiate a stop if they saw a driver drinking from a can but could not identify the brand.
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter

EEllis
Banned
Posts in topic: 47
Posts: 1888
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:54 pm

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#112

Post by EEllis »

MasterOfNone wrote: And they would not cause me to instinctively think "beer.". As I said, it appears to me they applied the "assume crime and make the citizen prove otherwise" approach. I suspect the same group would initiate a stop if they saw a driver drinking from a can but could not identify the brand.
Maybe so but you're not an ABC cop who has to justify the RS for a stop.

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#113

Post by Dave2 »

EEllis wrote:It does come in several flavors
[ Image ]
There's a peach-pear or pear-peach flavor as well that's fantastic. My roommate and I buy out the store every time either of us finds any (because there's usually just one case).
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.

Pacifist

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#114

Post by Pacifist »

apostate wrote:Perhaps they can't read cursive. ;-)
:smilelol5:

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 24
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#115

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

EEllis wrote:
MasterOfNone wrote:
EEllis wrote:...see what they believed was a minor carrying what appeared to be a 12 pack of beer.
This is the problem I am having. What made them "believe it was beer? They obviously did not positively identify it, so what made them believe it was beer instead of water or soda? I suspect it was a preformed bias toward believing it.
This just sounds a lot like the citizen having to prove innocence.
they don't have to positively identify it as beer it just has to be reasonable to them that it is. We, the courts, don't require law enforcement to be positive before allowing them it investigate or initiate a stop. There been no hint, except from people who in absolutely no position to know, that there was anything wrong with the RS for this stop.

Just for those who don't know this particular brand of water is canned not bottled and does not use the primarily single color packaging that soda uses. While soda and beer are not the only items that come in 12 pack cans these would certainly not cause me to instinctively think water.
It was wrong. In nonDear Leader land its not befitting a free people to be stopped for no reason.

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 24
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#116

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

EEllis wrote:
MasterOfNone wrote: And they would not cause me to instinctively think "beer.". As I said, it appears to me they applied the "assume crime and make the citizen prove otherwise" approach. I suspect the same group would initiate a stop if they saw a driver drinking from a can but could not identify the brand.
Maybe so but you're not an ABC cop who has to justify the RS for a stop.
You've basically said they don't have to either.
User avatar

E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#117

Post by E.Marquez »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:
EEllis wrote:
MasterOfNone wrote: And they would not cause me to instinctively think "beer.". As I said, it appears to me they applied the "assume crime and make the citizen prove otherwise" approach. I suspect the same group would initiate a stop if they saw a driver drinking from a can but could not identify the brand.
Maybe so but you're not an ABC cop who has to justify the RS for a stop.
You've basically said they don't have to either.

Well, no that is not really what he said :thumbs2:

And while I disagree with some of the positions EEllis has taken of late...
Lets not put words in his mouth he did not say... lets discuss only the ones he did.
EEllis wrote:they don't have to positively identify it as beer it just has to be reasonable to them that it is. We, the courts, don't require law enforcement to be positive before allowing them it investigate or initiate a stop
That statement by EEllis clearly opines a LEO must have at least reasonable suspicion of a crime committed for the stop... Hard to understand how an person having an honest conversation could read it otherwise.
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 24
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#118

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

hardly. His standard appears to be, if they have a bag, they are subject to a stop. Thats no standard at all as anyone with a bag can be stopped. Thats not reasonable in a free country.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26852
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#119

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Dave2 wrote:
EEllis wrote:It does come in several flavors
[ Image ]
There's a peach-pear or pear-peach flavor as well that's fantastic. My roommate and I buy out the store every time either of us finds any (because there's usually just one case).
My wife bought a couple of cases of that stuff about 3 months ago. I can't stand it, especially the coconut flavored one. It tastes like thinned out vomit and smells like suntan lotion.

Delightful. :roll:

We're still trying to get rid of it but I refuse to drink anymore of it so it's taking my wife a long time all by her onesies to not waste our money by throwing it out. :smilelol5:

I don't think those girls should have been arrested for buying it, but the store should be arrested for selling it. Yes....the whole store. It's a crime against humanity to sell that stuff.

And yes, the ATF agents showed really poor decision-making. OTH, so did the girls. Nobody comes out looking clean in this one.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

EEllis
Banned
Posts in topic: 47
Posts: 1888
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:54 pm

Re: Over-policing plus justified fear of impersonators

#120

Post by EEllis »

The Annoyed Man wrote: I don't think those girls should have been arrested for buying it, but the store should be arrested for selling it. Yes....the whole store. It's a crime against humanity to sell that stuff.
"rlol"
Post Reply

Return to “The Crime Blotter”