Need to ban naked men

Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26866
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Need to ban naked men

#16

Post by The Annoyed Man »

KD5NRH wrote:
JJVP wrote:We can't have naked men going around trying to choke dogs. There should be a law. :rules:

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/ ... 5447.story" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I just keep wondering who sissied-out a rottweiler to the point that the guy was able to get it in a chokehold without losing limbs.
Or something else....
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

mamabearCali
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2214
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:14 pm
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: Need to ban naked men

#17

Post by mamabearCali »

I think choking dogs is already illegal. Public nakedness is as well....as I don't think he took off his clothes on the other sir of the fence.


What I want to know is what is up with people taking their clothes off then attacking people. Seems pretty counterintuitive to me. The naked attacks however seem to be happening with some frequency now.

As a side note some of you boys are headed for the woodshed....IME the mods here are pretty ticklish about any sort of innuendo no matter how tame.
SAHM to four precious children. Wife to a loving husband.

"The women of this country learned long ago those without swords can still die upon them!" Eowyn in LOTR Two Towers
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Need to ban naked men

#18

Post by Oldgringo »

mamabearCali wrote:I think choking dogs is already illegal. Public nakedness is as well....as I don't think he took off his clothes on the other sir of the fence.


What I want to know is what is up with people taking their clothes off then attacking people. Seems pretty counterintuitive to me. The naked attacks however seem to be happening with some frequency now.

As a side note some of you boys are headed for the woodshed....IME the mods here are pretty ticklish about any sort of innuendo no matter how tame.
Right on, Sister! We got no room for no innuendo.... :rules:

longtooth
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 12329
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Angelina County

Re: Need to ban naked men

#19

Post by longtooth »

Oldgringo wrote:
mamabearCali wrote:I think choking dogs is already illegal. Public nakedness is as well....as I don't think he took off his clothes on the other sir of the fence.


What I want to know is what is up with people taking their clothes off then attacking people. Seems pretty counterintuitive to me. The naked attacks however seem to be happening with some frequency now.

As a side note some of you boys are headed for the woodshed....IME the mods here are pretty ticklish about any sort of innuendo no matter how tame.
Right on, Sister! We got no room for no innuendo.... :rules:
This one & the cavity search thread are both wearing me pretty thin. There is no continuing education or valid debate going on in either. Just folks trying to get as close to the edge of sexual inuendo as they can w/o getting the thread locked.
This is personal I know & not the Mod.
For the life of me I cant understand the thrill of having "Most Active Topic" in someones profile to be one of these subjects.
Image
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
User avatar

Moby
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 367
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:41 pm
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Need to ban naked men

#20

Post by Moby »

KD5NRH wrote:
JJVP wrote: I just keep wondering who sissied-out a rottweiler to the point that the guy was able to get it in a chokehold without losing limbs.
Agreed. Perhaps it was a younger dog. I had a 125 lb. Rottie named Rico (RIP)

I have little doubt the attacker "could" have been killed attacking my dog. However Rico was very well trained and absolutely fearless. A sissy by all outward apperences. But flip the switch and WHOA. Rottie Chainsaw!!!!!
He had a measured 295 lb bite. Incredibly powerful yet with no threat a big baby. The children used to climb all over him, poke at him, pull his ears. He seemed to love it. Or perhaps it was the free cookies he got from all of them.
Be without fear in the face of your enemies.
Stand brave and upright that the Lord may love thee.
Speak the truth always even if it means your death.
Protect the helpless and do no wrong!

Image
User avatar

Topic author
JJVP
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: Need to ban naked men

#21

Post by JJVP »

mamabearCali wrote:I think choking dogs is already illegal. Public nakedness is as well....as I don't think he took off his clothes on the other sir of the fence.


What I want to know is what is up with people taking their clothes off then attacking people. Seems pretty counterintuitive to me. The naked attacks however seem to be happening with some frequency now.

As a side note some of you boys are headed for the woodshed....IME the mods here are pretty ticklish about any sort of innuendo no matter how tame.

That is a side effect of using bath salts.
The people also -- the abusers of bath salts also frequently and for some unknown reason take their clothes off and tear away at their body parts.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/science/ ... 09-20.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.

philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18294
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Need to ban naked men

#22

Post by philip964 »

Seems having a Rottweiller by the neck is a fairly good defensive position, if there is such a thing with a Rottweiller. No, he would still be able to twist his head and take off your arm.

My son took care of a neighbor's Rottweiller and a Shitz Tsu for a couple who went on vacation. When he asked about a key to the house for when he came over, the husband responded that they don't lock the doors. No need.

The dog had the oddest habit. Once he got to know you, he would head for your crotch, duck down a little and pass between your legs. It was a great way for him to get a complete head to toe scratch. I won't say you were happy to oblige, but the cheating death part when it was over with was sort of a rush.

They had to get their mail at the house across the street.
Post Reply

Return to “The Crime Blotter”