Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

Reports of actual crimes and investigations, not hypothetical situations.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#16

Post by WildBill »

C-dub wrote:I think OC is legal in MN and I don't know about their restrictions on bars and guns.
A person with a pistol carry permit in Minnesota can carry openly or concealed. I can't find any restrictions about carrying in a bar on the Minnesota website. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=624.714" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

hi-power
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 748
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:43 am
Location: Grapevine, TX

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#17

Post by hi-power »

C-dub wrote:I think OC is legal in MN and I don't know about their restrictions on bars and guns.
This is a quote about the bar part from another source. I don't know whether it's true or not because I haven't looked it up.
Minnesota has no laws stating it is illegal to carry a pistol into an establishment that sells alcohol, however it is a crime to carry a concealed handgun when under the influence of alcohol. It is not known whether King had been drinking.

Bullwhip
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:31 am

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#18

Post by Bullwhip »

pbwalker wrote:
philip964 wrote:The incident has racial overtones as the CHL holder is Black and the police appeared to be Caucasian.
:shock:

wow...
I see one black face in the bunch of cops. It's a pretty white state, nothing unusual about that.

Dont' know if they picked him out because he's black, but they sure did him wrong if he's telling it how it really went down.
User avatar

pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#19

Post by pbwalker »

Bullwhip wrote:
pbwalker wrote:
philip964 wrote:The incident has racial overtones as the CHL holder is Black and the police appeared to be Caucasian.
:shock:

wow...
I see one black face in the bunch of cops. It's a pretty white state, nothing unusual about that.

Dont' know if they picked him out because he's black, but they sure did him wrong if he's telling it how it really went down.
It's a very white state...I spent 8 years of my life up there. But to say there are racial overtones is uninformed and incorrect.
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#20

Post by WildBill »

The picture shows the guy was pretty beat up. I don't recall anything about the man resisting arrest.
Image
NRA Endowment Member

philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 18291
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#21

Post by philip964 »

pbwalker wrote:
Bullwhip wrote:
pbwalker wrote:
philip964 wrote:The incident has racial overtones as the CHL holder is Black and the police appeared to be Caucasian.
:shock:

wow...
I see one black face in the bunch of cops. It's a pretty white state, nothing unusual about that.

Dont' know if they picked him out because he's black, but they sure did him wrong if he's telling it how it really went down.
It's a very white state...I spent 8 years of my life up there. But to say there are racial overtones is uninformed and incorrect.
Five white policemen beat up one black man who apparently has broken no laws. Racially motivated. No. Racial overtones. Yes. I stand by my choice of words.
Last edited by philip964 on Fri Jun 29, 2012 3:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

pbwalker
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3032
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 am
Location: Northern Colorado

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#22

Post by pbwalker »

philip964 wrote:
Five white policemen beat up one black man who apparently has broken no laws. Racially motivated. No. Racial overtones. Yes. I stand by my choice of words.

Five white police officers beat up one black man not apparently violating any law, racially motivated, no. Racial overtones. Yes. I stand by my choice of words.
Ok, well I like to pass judgement when I know all the facts. Not one side of the story as presented by a new article on the web.
*NRA Endowment Member* | Veteran
Vote Adam Kraut for the NRA Board of Directors - http://www.adamkraut.com/

clarionite
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:09 pm

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#23

Post by clarionite »

Edit:

[Voluntarily removed because it was viewed as a personal attack.]
Last edited by clarionite on Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#24

Post by Keith B »

OK folks, drop the personal attacks now.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4

clarionite
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 889
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:09 pm

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#25

Post by clarionite »

Keith B wrote:OK folks, drop the personal attacks now.
I'm sorry if my comment seemed to be personal. The jerk statement wasn't aimed at anyone in particular, but as a reason to dislike someone instead of race.

philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 18291
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#26

Post by philip964 »

pbwalker wrote:
philip964 wrote:
Five white policemen beat up one black man who apparently has broken no laws. Racially motivated. No. Racial overtones. Yes. I stand by my choice of words.

Five white police officers beat up one black man not apparently violating any law, racially motivated, no. Racial overtones. Yes. I stand by my choice of words.
Ok, well I like to pass judgement when I know all the facts. Not one side of the story as presented by a new article on the web.
I shoot from the hip, as I have already switched sides once on this thread.

Transplant
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:22 am
Location: Frisco

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#27

Post by Transplant »

Here is a follow up article with more details. I dont think it's been posted yet.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/i-thoug ... the-blaze/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Couple of high points:
After leaving a local nightclub, King said he was walking down a Minneapolis street heading towards his truck at around 2:45 a.m. when he observed some police officers in front of him, which he says “wasn’t a problem” because he was doing nothing wrong.
Before making it to his vehicle, though, one of the officers stopped him and asked, “Hey, what’s that bulge under your shirt?”
King said he put his hands in the air and informed the officer that he was in possession of a handgun and a legal concealed carry permit. His permit does not expire until 2017, he said.
“He did not ask first to see my permit, he did not ask to see my ID,” King explained. “He just grabbed me by the neck and slammed me against the wall and snatched my gun from its holster, screaming ‘gun! gun! gun!’”
Four additional cops reacted to the commotion and began beating King and slamming his face on the ground, he said.
King says he had not been drinking any alcohol the night he was beaten and arrested and claims he took two separate breathalyzer tests, one administered by the police and another at the hospital. Both readings turned up zero traces of alcohol, he says, although that has not been verified by officials.
“I did not drink one lick at all … . I know I’m not supposed to when I have my gun,” King told The Blaze. “I wanted them to give me a breathalyzer because I knew I hadn’t been drinking anything and they have to try to find a reason for why they beat and arrested me.”
If his story is true this seems bad.

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#28

Post by Dave2 »

Transplant wrote:Here is a follow up article with more details. I dont think it's been posted yet.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/i-thoug ... the-blaze/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Couple of high points:
After leaving a local nightclub, King said he was walking down a Minneapolis street heading towards his truck at around 2:45 a.m. when he observed some police officers in front of him, which he says “wasn’t a problem” because he was doing nothing wrong.
Before making it to his vehicle, though, one of the officers stopped him and asked, “Hey, what’s that bulge under your shirt?”
King said he put his hands in the air and informed the officer that he was in possession of a handgun and a legal concealed carry permit. His permit does not expire until 2017, he said.
“He did not ask first to see my permit, he did not ask to see my ID,” King explained. “He just grabbed me by the neck and slammed me against the wall and snatched my gun from its holster, screaming ‘gun! gun! gun!’”
Four additional cops reacted to the commotion and began beating King and slamming his face on the ground, he said.
King says he had not been drinking any alcohol the night he was beaten and arrested and claims he took two separate breathalyzer tests, one administered by the police and another at the hospital. Both readings turned up zero traces of alcohol, he says, although that has not been verified by officials.
“I did not drink one lick at all … . I know I’m not supposed to when I have my gun,” King told The Blaze. “I wanted them to give me a breathalyzer because I knew I hadn’t been drinking anything and they have to try to find a reason for why they beat and arrested me.”
If his story is true this seems bad.
... for the cops, that is. Dunno how well-off he is now, but King will be able to live like one for a very long after his lawyers are done with this.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar

tacticool
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#29

Post by tacticool »

Dave2 wrote:
Transplant wrote:If his story is true this seems bad.
... for the cops, that is. Dunno how well-off he is now, but King will be able to live like one for a very long after his lawyers are done with this.
He wasn't killed, so I wouldn't count on him getting more than Scott's family.
When in doubt
Vote them out!
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Minn. Police Beat Man For Gun, Despite Permit

#30

Post by WildBill »

tacticool wrote:
Dave2 wrote:
Transplant wrote:If his story is true this seems bad.
... for the cops, that is. Dunno how well-off he is now, but King will be able to live like one for a very long after his lawyers are done with this.
He wasn't killed, so I wouldn't count on him getting more than Scott's family.
The amount of a settlement that a person gets depends on many factors. Whether or not it is "a lot of money" or will leave them "well off" is relative.

When someone is killed, and their heirs sue, the future earning capacity of the deceased is one of the factors that is used to determine the amount of a settlement. Whether or not the heirs will agree to the proposal depends on the financial situation of the heirs and how much or how little they will settle. For some people a lump sum of $100,000 is a lot of money. More than they would ever see in their lifetime. For others, that amount as a proposed settlement would be considered an insult.
NRA Endowment Member
Post Reply

Return to “The Crime Blotter”