Strat9mm wrote:I never thought of it that way.
I have to say that requiring anyone to get a license to carry, open or otherwise, would seem to be a defacto infringement.
The courts have ruled the right pertains to the military, but the word used in the document, is PEOPLE.
It was PEOPLE who armed themselves, ordinary CITIZENS with their own weapons, who formed the militias, not the other way around. That point seems to have been overlooked for some reason.
Just because someone is in the judiciary, doesn't mean they are qualified, or will render sound UNBIASED decisions in DEFENSE of the Constitution.
It sure seems as if bribery, undue influence, and problems rending UNBIASED decisions which UPHOLD the Constitution have been problems from the beginning.
That much has become painfully obvious.
have you actually read any of the court decisions? no I thought not, go back and read them, the supreme court rendered a decision that the second amendment affirms a RIGHT of the PEOPLE. doesn't bother to read loves conspiracy theories, ok your on ignore