Search found 2 matches
Return to “TX - duty to retreat?”
- Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:57 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: TX - duty to retreat?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 7694
Re: TX - duty to retreat?
it very may well give an opening to those who get lead injection due to attempting to seriously injure or kill a person by a third party to sue for damages, I hope it doesn't go through the house and senate and gets laughed off the floor, but I fear that it may not as we have wimps in the Texas house and senate. I never liked or agreed with the requirement to retreat from a hostile force and still don't, it always made the responsible actor the criminal as opposed to the actual criminal aggressor responsible to run away, or an abrogation of the right to life of the victim
- Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:20 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: TX - duty to retreat?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 7694
Re: TX - duty to retreat?
it appears that someone is trying to put back what was removed, in the past you had a duty to retreat before using any deadly force no matter where you were. now it looks like that if you are trying to defend a 3rd party you have to run away before using deadly force, hmmmmm maybe that OSHA complaint by the robbers, muggers and burglars union has actually been received and acted upon by the Emperors OSHA cronies