CenTex wrote:excerpt from my prior note...RottenApple wrote:************snip**********CenTex wrote:I am sick and tired of people nitpicking 30.06 signs; If there is a 'NO GUNS' sign of any kind posted, it should be respected; you are putting your ego above personal or managed property rights...
So it seems to me that YOU are the one putting your ego where it doesn't need to be. Namely in telling everyone else here what to do. If you choose to obey a gun-buster sign, then have at it. Enjoy. Do your best. As for me, I'll respect and follow the law.
Regardless of the legal discussion, my concern is for the property owner or manager to be able to control his property in the manner he desires as long as it is not illegal. I know you can not be prosecuted or otherwise have your rights or legal protections imposed on but I believe you should respect the rules or request of the property owners. If you are on my property, I would strongly suggest you do so. (I own and run 200 acres of wildlife conservation land and I have had to educate a person or two that chose to violate my rules.)
yep you can ask someone to leave your property, you can even tell them they can't have a concealed weapon, but if you go to edumacatin them you just might find yourself on the wrong side of a very large hole. the law is the law, a generic no guns sign or gunbuster sign doesn't meet the requirement of the law so therefore according to the law I am allowed to ignore the sign period if you don't want CHL on your wild life park then post the LEGAL sign. the law has given a property owner the method by which they may exclude a CHL and it isn't a generic sign. so either comply with the law or stop belly aching about those of us who obey the law