TexasCHLforum.com

hpcatx wrote:

JP171 wrote:

hpcatx wrote:

JP171 wrote:the NOPD did what the law in LA. said they were allowed to do

This was still a violation of the Louisiana Constitution... and that was before the recent vote to amend it with stronger RKBA language.

ok, however I did hear right after the incident that the law in LA. stated the governor could declare a state of emergency and confiscate personally owned weapons, but if the law didn't say that ok, if however it did thats why they included in the new law a repeal of and language fobidding such action from the effective date of the law.

My original point stands though, in neither case did the Military of Either state nor federal act in the incidents of firearms confiscation or attempted arrest of felons

Wasn't negating your post. Merely pointing out that it's not so outlandish to think that Obama might try an unconstitutional executive order. History shows all that is needed is the claim (true or manufactured) of crisis.

hpcatx wrote:

JP171 wrote:the NOPD did what the law in LA. said they were allowed to do

This was still a violation of the Louisiana Constitution... and that was before the recent vote to amend it with stronger RKBA language.

handog wrote:

JP171 wrote:

Texas Dan Mosby wrote:

LSUTiger wrote:This is the same type of feedback I have received from my ex-military and LEO buddies. I hope what they say is true, that for the most part the LE and Military won't enforce gun confiscation.

First, the military and LEO's follow the orders of those appointed over them, and if the law calls for gun confiscation, then they WILL do as they are ordered and attempt to confiscate guns.

Period.

Second, house to house gun confiscation is simply not practical. While I can see selected areas of any given community being targeted and searched, I don't see this course of action being employed for EVERY home in the nation. I can see them trying to establish a "no later time" for turn in, after which, any firearms found would be grounds for criminal charges.

Regardless, execution of any confiscation policy would require an enormous amount of logistical support and assets that can certainly be disrupted by a determined group of citizens without resorting to directly targeting individuals that are tasked with carrying out such policies.

NO WE WON'T!!!! all of us will REFUSE unlawful orders PERIOD!!!

Please present an example. Because If Katrina and Waco are an example then YES YOU WILL!!!

Texas Dan Mosby wrote:

LSUTiger wrote:This is the same type of feedback I have received from my ex-military and LEO buddies. I hope what they say is true, that for the most part the LE and Military won't enforce gun confiscation.

First, the military and LEO's follow the orders of those appointed over them, and if the law calls for gun confiscation, then they WILL do as they are ordered and attempt to confiscate guns.

Period.

Second, house to house gun confiscation is simply not practical. While I can see selected areas of any given community being targeted and searched, I don't see this course of action being employed for EVERY home in the nation. I can see them trying to establish a "no later time" for turn in, after which, any firearms found would be grounds for criminal charges.

Regardless, execution of any confiscation policy would require an enormous amount of logistical support and assets that can certainly be disrupted by a determined group of citizens without resorting to directly targeting individuals that are tasked with carrying out such policies.