Lambda Force wrote:It said they found porn but it didn't say they find child porn or other illegal porn.
It said they found guns but it didn't say they find machineguns or other illegal guns.
It said they found "suspect literature" but it didn't say any of the literature was illegal.
Some of us think it's relevant whether he actually had child porn or a copy of Playboy. Some of you maybe don't. Some people may even think there's a difference between pictures of little children and pictures a teenager took of herself and posted online without a copy of her birth certificate showing her age. Or a photo taken two days from now if one of the women getting beads is 17 but looks 20.
According to what I read, under the current laws, if she looks 18 and says she's 18, that's not a defense if it's still a week before her 18th birtday. Kind of like a gun where the barrel is 1/8 inch too short because your tape measure is inaccurate.
I personally believe that this is the wrong reason to prosucute someone, alot of young women lie about age, short of asking for ID there is at times no real way to tell and even ID isn't always accurate. so now we have a sex offender for no real reason other than there is a statute against it, same as statutory sexual assault, needs to go away