Personally I surprised he didn't call her on it. All he ad to say was "Madam Senator, did you say "hundreds" of school shootings?"Jusme wrote: ↑Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:44 pmRoyGBiv wrote: ↑Thu Sep 06, 2018 3:26 pmShe's lying. Already completely debunked... By NPR!Jusme wrote: ↑Thu Sep 06, 2018 1:47 pm I am just wondering, where these "hundreds" of school shootings, where "assault" rifles were used, occurred? Did I miss all of the news reports? I would challenge Feinstein, to produce a list of these hundreds, of cases, so that we can fully appreciate the magnitude, of this atrocity.
From Reason.com.... Dianne Feinstein Wants Brett Kavanaugh to 'Reconcile' His Second Amendment Reasoning With 'Hundreds of School Shootings' That Never Happened
.
And from NPR:
Yeah, it's different if you are testifying, and defending your opinions, at that point you are expected to tell the truth, in fact you swear an oath to do just that. I would be livid, if the person asking the questions, told such a blatant lie. But then again, it's the left, they aren't held to the same standards as everyone else.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Feinstein vs Kavanaugh”
- Fri Sep 07, 2018 9:39 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8623
Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh
- Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:20 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh
- Replies: 40
- Views: 8623
Re: Feinstein vs Kavanaugh
AS he probably expected, so he was simply grandstanding and being as disruptive as possible. (Any additional comments would be censored...)chamberc wrote: ↑Thu Sep 06, 2018 2:07 pmBooker didn’t actually break any rules. The Republicans on the Judiciary Committee worked with the George W. Bush library and the Justice Department overnight to clear the emails. The restrictions were waived early Thursday morning.Richbirdhunter wrote: ↑Thu Sep 06, 2018 11:14 am I want to know if Booker is going to be in trouble for releasing classified documents
