![Image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tbiF7YfuHvM/hqdefault.jpg)
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Return to “Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal”
Tell it to DJT and WLP. They're the ones who shoved gun owners down that slippery slope.Soccerdad1995 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:20 pm Bump firing is a shooting technique. If bump firing is bad, because we want to limit the rate of fire, then it's a very, very, slippery slope that does not end well.
An AR-15 with a bump stock only fires one round per trigger pull, the same as an AR-15 without one. A bump stock is not required to bump fire an AR-15. It can be "readily" done without a bump stock.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:51 pm Good luck with that. The bumpstock ban notwithstanding, an AR15 still only fires one round per function of the trigger—bumpstock or no bumpstock. And since the ban, there’s no lawful way (just like before bumpstocks were invented) to convert an AR15 to fire at the same rate as a fully automatic weapon.