Ruark wrote: ↑Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:14 am
I haven't read her tweets (I don't do Twitter), and she should NOT be banned from Twitter, but she needs to chill a little about VAERS. VAERS is very misleading; it's just a count of adverse health events that happen within a certain time frame after vaccination. Like, if you get vaccinated, then have a heart attack or something afterwards, it's counted in VAERS. The events are evaluated to determine whether or not they may be RELATED to the vaccination; no cause and effect is implied or even suggested. Anti-vaxxers love to wave VAERS statistics around. Anyway, just saying...............
agree with you on the VAERS mis-use. I ran into it chasing down some claims for friends.