It looks to me like they do actually have real data on effectiveness of natural immunity. Off of my first link here is a cited link. From that you can read summary conclusions etc but as you work through it it cites the specific studies (multiple, and the findings from those).flechero wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 2:13 pmTHanks for that link, interesting read and subsequent read through it's links.jerry_r60 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 11:33 amHere is some of that info you mentioned you are looking for.flechero wrote: ↑Thu Dec 23, 2021 10:18 am My wife had reaction, as did my mother in law. One of my wife's Drs said it actually pretty common- they just don't publicize it and many of her colleagues treat symptoms as an independent thing and don't report the relationship to the shot.
I fear that there is a ton of valuable [and damaging] info not being shared with the public.
I'm still waiting for the study that compares the effectiveness of the covid shots vs natural immunity.All the news is unvaxxed this and that.... but the Dr's we know are saying their load is vaxxed/boosted people, or unvaxxed that never had covid... further stating that reinfections are rare.
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/ ... ed-to-know
THey still don't give any real data on effectiveness of nat. immunity.
Every time I read through the studies and the cite's I come to the conclusion that the initial reports are cherry picked. From on of the actual studies cited in that linkThe studies say that vax after infection is better but never gives you full picture. One says you significantly enhance your protected with both natural and vax but never gives a natural rate. So is it worth the risks to go from a 0.0X chance to a 0.00x chance? I think not. Especially since omnicron is less severe and my response to the original covid was very mild.few real-world epidemiologic studies exist to support the benefit of vaccination for previously infected persons.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... 5540069868
you can see the results in the tables and then the citations to the specific studies. You can then go to those studies and see methodology, data, results etc.
It seems the data is out there it just takes some digging to get down to the source studies if you don't trust the study aggegation done by Johns Hopkins. There are multiple studies cited for immune response efficacy and duration and the same for vaccines.
The studies are also from multiple countries. Here is a link to one of the citations:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanc ... 4/fulltext
Do to the nature of the beast, I don't think any of these things are perfect but as each of these tests takes a slightly different angle a picture gets formed for the scientific / medical community.