TexasCHLforum.com

Papa_Tiger wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 7:37 am

TxRVer wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 7:15 am All of this talk about entering a business that posts 30.06/07 but not 30.05 reminds me of discussions after the passing of open carry. Remember all the talk about being able to enter OC when 30.06 was posted but not 30.07? How did that pan out?

And per the handout from [Prepaid legal service], the giant Gun Buster watermark on the most common 30.06/7 signs would serve as notice against unlicensed carry. So I think it amounts to a tempest in a teapot.

This is an interesting point regarding the "gun buster" on a 30.07 or 30.06. I'm guessing the fact that it's on a 30.06 or 30.07 doesn't mean it can't serve as the 30.05 notice per this document. So by design of most 30.06 or 30.07 signs, they also double as 30.05. That also takes away the argument of carrying under the authority of constitutional carry to get past an .06/.07.

With this said, I see this document says a "gunbuster" does block unlicensed carry however I don't see how this squares with the language in the bill. While 30.05 uses the language "substantially similar too..." it has specific verbiage, text size etc. I don't see how a gunbuster could be perceived as "substantially similar too" to a reasonable person.

I'm curious how the Legal Defense folks arrived at their conclusion regarding the signs.