Search found 3 matches
Return to “Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?”
- Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:17 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2421
Re: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?
Pretty sure that access to a good grip is the obvious thing I was overlooking.
- Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:00 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2421
Re: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?
Yowsers!Dori wrote:I can't think of any advantage as long as the entire trigger is covered.WildBill wrote:ThisAndyC wrote:Holstermakers have to balancesurferdaddy wrote:So, I have often wondered why many (most of my) holsters are designed with a space exposed at the rear of the trigger guard rather than fully covering that area
1. covering the trigger while
2. leaving enough space for the strong hand to get a proper grip like below:
Also, I don't think that there is any valid safety reason that the guard needs to be fully covered.
At first I thought he was asking about something like this holster.
[ Image ]
- Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:58 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2421
Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?
So, I have often wondered why many (most of my) holsters are designed with a space exposed at the rear of the trigger guard rather than fully covering that area; is this to prevent something which may be caught around the trigger from fully depressing the trigger when holstered? I've never understood why holster makers don't just go all the way and completely cover the trigger area. It is likely something really obvious that I'm a bit too dense to see. Oh well, any thoughts on this, I'm curious as to what you all think.