Search found 3 matches

by surferdaddy
Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:17 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?
Replies: 8
Views: 2421

Re: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?

Pretty sure that access to a good grip is the obvious thing I was overlooking.
by surferdaddy
Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:00 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?
Replies: 8
Views: 2421

Re: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?

Dori wrote:
WildBill wrote:
AndyC wrote:
surferdaddy wrote:So, I have often wondered why many (most of my) holsters are designed with a space exposed at the rear of the trigger guard rather than fully covering that area
Holstermakers have to balance
1. covering the trigger while
2. leaving enough space for the strong hand to get a proper grip like below:
:iagree: This

Also, I don't think that there is any valid safety reason that the guard needs to be fully covered.
:iagree: I can't think of any advantage as long as the entire trigger is covered.

At first I thought he was asking about something like this holster. :shock:

[ Image ]
Yowsers!
by surferdaddy
Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:58 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?
Replies: 8
Views: 2421

Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?

So, I have often wondered why many (most of my) holsters are designed with a space exposed at the rear of the trigger guard rather than fully covering that area; is this to prevent something which may be caught around the trigger from fully depressing the trigger when holstered? I've never understood why holster makers don't just go all the way and completely cover the trigger area. It is likely something really obvious that I'm a bit too dense to see. Oh well, any thoughts on this, I'm curious as to what you all think.

Return to “Why no FULLY covered trigger in many holsters?”