I can only speak for myself. What you said is income IS NOT income for federal tax purposes (unless you're a beneficiary of a tax deferred vehicle upon death - which should be excluded from the estate anyway, so the beneficiary gets stuck w/ paying the tax that was deferred).rm9792 wrote:Again, i was not arguing how it was treated. Just the fact it is not double taxation. Why does everyone want to delve into law when i am just referring to the definition of "income". There are lots of forms of income and lots of ways it is handled. I, again, am talking at a very high level not the specific laws.
I'm not sure what argument you're making "at a very high level not the specific laws." I guess that was lost on me and I have not followed this thread enough in detail. How you want to define income for your own "very high level" theoretical debate is fine I guess, but some of us have to deal with the reality of what is income and subject to federal income taxation (and "logic" contrary to that reality is something I don't like to see unchallenged).