TexasCHLforum.com

I agree w/ you, HP. Obama supporters are quick to attack the Breitbart release as another "crazy birther" story. They're not capable of being objective.

Far from a "birther" angle (let's forget about where he was born, it's not important for this question), I'll repeat: How does such a "mistake" in his bio occur. Was it just a simple editor error (quite a mistake!!) or as others have pointed out, is this another case of Obama being who he needs to be to take maximum advantage of his current situation?

Since Obama is always cool, maybe it was cool to be born in Kenya in academia (or maybe there were other advantages for someone that wasn't "born with a silver spoon," looking to attend Columbia and Harvard...).

Heartland Patriot wrote:The Breitbart article stated emphatically that they were NOT in the "Birther" category nor have they been. They posted what they did to show basically what mamabearCali stated, that for the Occupier, its all about being the right person to the crowd of the moment. Its a sign of deceit and lies, the chameleon face of someone who only cares about winning elections. There are obviously those who WANT this to be a "Birther" issue so they can paint the Occupier's enemies as "crazies" because they know he will lose if the merits of his time in office are what he actually has to run on...

The question arises as to how such a "mistake" in his bio occurs. Would there have been an advantage to a Columbia or Harvard student (financial or otherwise) to claim to be a "foreign" student (born in Kenya)? Would such a claim necessarily follow a person into subsequent bios? ...Btw, have we ever his seen college records from Columbia or Harvard?