TexasCHLforum.com

atticus wrote:Interesting question, whether to support Romney or not. It's the end of May, the fall election is a little over 5 months away, and Romney will be the Republican nominee. If not Romney, then who? Obama? Really? Levin is a fine, fine man. I take his view on Cruz very seriously. But criticize him for supporting Romney? Are you serious? We need all hands on deck to get rid of Obama.

I can count the number of conservatives (or self proclaimed conservatives) that had Romney as their number one (or even second) choice going into the primaries on one hand. Like you said, now that Romney will be the nominee there is only one sensible vote to cast.

lbuehler325 wrote:

Slowplay wrote:

Bullwhip wrote:I thought I was for Ted Cruz for a long time, even overlooked the whole Goldman Sachs thing (his firm represents them, his wife is a VP), then he started bragging about Mark Levin endorsing him. Seriously, I can't think of any neocon more vile than Mark Levin, wants to bomb everyone.

Thats' when I found Addison. He's' not polling good, not getting publicity, but I'm voting my conscience for Glenn Addison.

Thanks - you have reinforced my support for Cruz.

Paulbots and liberals call Mark Levin the pejorative "neocon" (which is funny, because Mark Levin has voiced opposition to many of the overseas interventions/actions by the Obama admin, often in agreement w/ Ron Paul). Levin's Landmark Legal Foundation has also been on the front lines fighting Obamacare, filing amicus briefs early & often. Sorry, can't take your opposition to Ted Cruz seriously.

Serious question - what has Addison done to defend the 2nd Amendment?

I know what Ted Cruz has done (District of Columbia v. Heller).

That's a lot of love for Mark Levin. Isn't this the same guy who supports Romney (one of the two worst of the original Republican candidates with respect to the 2nd Amendment), and then ask about Addison's stance on 2A. With respect to the 2A, I can respect what Cruz has done and the position he's taken. As a strict Constitutionalist though, I would imagine Addison will be a strong defender of our 2A rights.

This is hilarious to me - First we have a person claiming they were for Ted Cruz, but then had a 'change of heart' after a Mark Levin (someone this person hates) endorses Cruz. That is just simply absurd to me.

Now we have you, continuing on that path and making someone that endorsed Ted Cruz the target by making additional errant statements.

For someone that claims to be supportive of a candidate that's a "Constitutionalist," you either know next to nothing about Landmark Legal or don't really agree with their efforts.

Also, I'll side with a candidate that has proven their positions over someone you "would imagine" would be strong in their positions.

Bullwhip wrote:I thought I was for Ted Cruz for a long time, even overlooked the whole Goldman Sachs thing (his firm represents them, his wife is a VP), then he started bragging about Mark Levin endorsing him. Seriously, I can't think of any neocon more vile than Mark Levin, wants to bomb everyone.

Thats' when I found Addison. He's' not polling good, not getting publicity, but I'm voting my conscience for Glenn Addison.

Thanks - you have reinforced my support for Cruz.

Paulbots and liberals call Mark Levin the pejorative "neocon" (which is funny, because Mark Levin has voiced opposition to many of the overseas interventions/actions by the Obama admin, often in agreement w/ Ron Paul). Levin's Landmark Legal Foundation has also been on the front lines fighting Obamacare, filing amicus briefs early & often. Sorry, can't take your opposition to Ted Cruz seriously.

Serious question - what has Addison done to defend the 2nd Amendment?

I know what Ted Cruz has done (District of Columbia v. Heller).