Search found 1 match

by snscott
Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:24 pm
Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Discussion of Pending Bills
Replies: 50
Views: 9744

And our company location has a single security monitor at the front desk that cycles through views of the parking lots. We have one security person "working" this front desk in the lobby. So, by these rules, the company can claim they DO monitor the parking lot and so therefore CAN prohibit firearms in vehicles without the expense of a fence or gate.

Which is just plain Bravo Sierra.

Why do they need to have ANY of that "unless/except" language in there? Just flat out state that CHL holders can keep their guns in their cars in the parking lot. Period. (But, as has been stated, even this still wouldn't matter because they can fire you without giving any reason). So what is the freaking point?

I would rather this law read that any company which has such a policy is LEGALLY LIABLE for their employees' personal safety from the time they leave home to come to work to the time they arrive home from work each day, so that if I am killed in a car-jacking, for example, my family can sue the company into the ground.

Return to “Discussion of Pending Bills”