I admit that since the other two examples were public in nature, I concluded the third was as well.RPBrown wrote:(1) Incorrect. My business is a corporation and I am under no requirement to prohibit carry of any typegoose wrote:Point one is incorrect. Imagine a company with three employees and a company with 10k employees spread over four or five campuses, both get two "marshalls?" Seems legit.
Point two is incorrect. Either they believe 1) that open carry is okay inside a 51% establishment so a 30.07 sign would be required (if hte owner wanter to ban folks, presumably) but not a 30.06 because the 51% sign covers concealed carry? or 2) if a 30.07 sign is simply mandatory, what is the purpose of the 51% sign? What additional information is it communicating?
Point three: Texas is not a constitutional carry state. He can believe whatever he wants but this sounds like braggadocio. Or good luck. Or part of the good ol' boy system in some small town/county.
(2) Also incorrect. A caveat to this could be a bar operated as a separate entity within a business. The business would heave the option to post 30.07 signs but it is not required either within a 51% bar or any business
(3) The reason I highlighted this is you could open carry on your own property prior to OC going into effect
Search found 2 matches
- Thu Mar 09, 2017 8:49 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Mandatory Signage
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3165
Re: Mandatory Signage
- Wed Mar 08, 2017 11:09 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Mandatory Signage
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3165
Re: Mandatory Signage
Point one is incorrect. Imagine a company with three employees and a company with 10k employees spread over four or five campuses, both get two "marshalls?" Seems legit.
Point two is incorrect. Either they believe 1) that open carry is okay inside a 51% establishment so a 30.07 sign would be required (if hte owner wanter to ban folks, presumably) but not a 30.06 because the 51% sign covers concealed carry? or 2) if a 30.07 sign is simply mandatory, what is the purpose of the 51% sign? What additional information is it communicating?
Point three: Texas is not a constitutional carry state. He can believe whatever he wants but this sounds like braggadocio. Or good luck. Or part of the good ol' boy system in some small town/county.
Point two is incorrect. Either they believe 1) that open carry is okay inside a 51% establishment so a 30.07 sign would be required (if hte owner wanter to ban folks, presumably) but not a 30.06 because the 51% sign covers concealed carry? or 2) if a 30.07 sign is simply mandatory, what is the purpose of the 51% sign? What additional information is it communicating?
Point three: Texas is not a constitutional carry state. He can believe whatever he wants but this sounds like braggadocio. Or good luck. Or part of the good ol' boy system in some small town/county.