TexasCHLforum.com

WildBill wrote:

Coy Greer wrote:I do honestly believe that burn=Mr.Burnam himself. Only a F rated Liberal Dem and a definite non gun owner would use each and every anti-gun buzzword and catch phrase to try and garner support for an antigun bill on a progun forum.

I really doubt that. Since he has already gone on public record, there is no reason for him to conceal his identity and he would probably be more articulate posting his arguments.

P.S. There is no such thing as "negative support."

I see your point, however, his ship(Bill) is clearly sinking, and a man on a sinking ship will quite often try anything to save his ship(Bill), even playing a 3rd version incognito of himslef to get support. However, your probably right, and the poster was just using the name burn cause he thought it was cute. Also, you are very correct about negative support, it has been corrected. thanks!

Ladies and Gentlemen, I have gone through and read all of the posts made by "burn", and quite honestly, after taking into account the Firmly Brady buzzwords, terminology that is only used by the Anti side, and the style and composition of the statements, I think we may have been unfortunatly graced by the Author of the bill himslef. Which isn't surprising considering the amount of support against this bill that was expressed by the members of this board, im sure the name of this website was without a doubt included in that support against this bill. I do honestly believe that burn=Mr.Burnam himself. Only a F rated Liberal Dem and a definite non gun owner would use each and every anti-gun buzzword and catch phrase to try and garner support for an antigun bill on a progun forum. So sorry for you Lon, better luck next time!