Search found 2 matches

by LSUTiger
Mon Nov 11, 2024 11:29 am
Forum: Reloading Forum
Topic: Some peoples reloading math is retarded
Replies: 5
Views: 1562

Re: Some peoples reloading math is retarded

mr surveyor wrote: Sat Nov 09, 2024 12:48 pm As one that started late in life in reloading/handloading (January, 2011), the only thing that makes me believe that my "math is retarded" is that I waited so long to begin.

The "math" thing is just not understood. My first couple of years was spent in a beginner's learning curve, only on a couple of calibers. I shot all of what I loaded during that time period until my loading skills began to reach the point that the loaded inventory started building up. After a couple of years, and continued buying components, the cost savings became apparent and I started reloading for 6-7 different cartridges that went to the range with me. Now, I have a couple hundred loaded rounds on hand for each of the less used cartridges, four or five hundred rounds for each of the most often used cartridges, and enough components on hand to load at least a couple thousand various rounds.

I'm reduced down to only one trip to the range per week. and then only shoot about 50-60 rounds ... but I still load 50-100 rounds most weeks. If I were depending on factory ammunition, even if were magically available when I wanted it, I'd have to reduce my shooting by 30-50%.

jd
If you keep on buying components, and shoot less than you reload, you will certainly build up a stock of ammunition. That is called being prepared.
Likewise, I always replace what i shoot and buy a little more factory ammo in bulk periodically. No changes to my shooting habits. That is called being prepared.

However, in both cases, we can each only rely on what we have on hand at any given time and you cannot produce more ammunition than the amount of components that you have on hand. So back to my initial assertion, cost/benefit aside, if I have 1000 rounds of factory ammo and you have 1000 rounds of components we each have 1000 rounds.
by LSUTiger
Mon Nov 04, 2024 5:34 pm
Forum: Reloading Forum
Topic: Some peoples reloading math is retarded
Replies: 5
Views: 1562

Some peoples reloading math is retarded

I don't reload, it's totally not worth it for me. If you reload then good for you!

However there is one reloading fallacy that I continually hear from reloaders that perplexes me and that is the is the reloader math when it comes to the implied reloader claims of being able to reload to infinity with finite resources.

The implication being that reloaders are better off because they reload in terms of being able to have perpetual ammo during hard times vs those who don't reload.

Example:

I have 1000 rounds of factory ammo. Therefore, I have 1000 rounds, ready for use and easily portable.

A reloader has 1000 rounds worth of reloading components. Therefore he has the potential to have 1000 rounds. They are not ready for use and not easily portable.

In ammo shortages (where surplus components either scarce or nonexistent because they are going to supply factor ammo manufacturing) and a problem arises, it comes down to preparedness and what you have on hand.

You can only reload with components you have on hand. I can shoot only what I have on hand. You can rely only with what you have on hand being the lesson. Be prepared and plan ahead.

Reload if it's worth it to you but don't buy into the fallacy that reloading = perpetual ammo in hard times.

Return to “Some peoples reloading math is retarded”