Search found 16 matches

by mamabearCali
Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:05 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

One cannot retreat if the earth is in ones way. Zimmerman was flat on his back being pummeled.
by mamabearCali
Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:51 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

It takes more than a series of carpet bagging race baiters to undo the will of the people. This whole business about stand your ground anyway is a misnomer. According to Zimmerman he had already retreated and if the earth is in your way you cannot retreat any further if you are being attacked. So this is simple self defense. Do these idiots really want to lock up the woman who kills her boyfriend while he is strangling her? Do they really think they can do away with the notion of self defense that has been associated with common law for at least 1000 years over one case? If Florida undoes its laws on this to please these dum dums it goes on my list of places to not go.

This type of stuff really makes me mad. Knee jerk reactionary law is total baloney.
by mamabearCali
Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:59 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

03Lightningrocks wrote:
jmra wrote:Using your logic I could say that if Martin hadn't been dealing drugs and gotten himself suspended from school he wouldnt have been in the neighborhood in the first place. So being a drug dealer resulted in his death.

Using your logic, if zimmerman had not been born in the first place, none of this would have happened. How about we all quit reaching so far and get back to reality? I am actually surprised so many of you think that CHL gives you Batman authority. Good luck with that.

Zimmerman creating the situation by butting in where he was not needed is logical... your logic is just rediculous at any level.
How do you know he "butted in"? That would imply some overt action on his part. Right now all we know is that he observed and followed an individual he perceived as suspicious, and called the police. Even if he engaged Mr. Martin with a "what are you doing?" that is still no reason to try and beat someone to death.

If Zimmerman had not gotten out of he car (completely legal) this would not have happened. If Mr. Martin had not been using/distributing/whatever with marijuana (not legal), he would not have been there. If....if...if... But so far from what we know Mr. Martin committed a very illegal act here...Using lethal force (puching someones head into he ground) on an obviously not lethal threat (Zimmerman on the ground).
by mamabearCali
Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:33 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

03Lightningrocks wrote:
bzo311 wrote:
03Lightningrocks wrote:I'm not ready to hang Zimmerman.... Heck....maybe he did us all a favor...I don't have any way of knowing.

The one and only firm position I have on this situation is that the average citizen is not well advised to play cop. Too much can go wrong and we may be causing a crime by trying to see if someone is about to commit a crime. If Zimmerman had been following me around... I would have assumed he was about to mug me... Or worse. This is a great example of why we as citizens should not try to play police officer.

It appears that Zimmerman has made a wrong choice here and it may cost him dearly. For what?.. He did not witness ANY crime being committed by the kid he was stalking.
I hear you, but you have to listen to what you are saying. To me it sounds like you're saying that we shouldn't take interest in other people's actions because that person could savagely attack us and force us to defend ourselves....

.. So if Zimmerman were following you, and then asked you "what are you doing here?" You would have hauled off and clocked him? I doubt it. I am sure that most of us would have gone with a verbal approach.


Taking interest in someone else's actions is not the same as intervening in someone else's actions. My response to zimmermans question would be less than polite. unfortunately, I might have clocked Zimmerman if I thought he was setting me up and getting to close. Isn't everyone on this forum always posting about staying in code yellow or something like that?

Zimmerman nor anyone else has the right to accost any of us, regardless of our physical look.
Right now we don't know that Zimmerman did that at all. All we know for sure (if we know anything for sure here) is that at some point he followed Martin and at some point Martin was on top of him beating his head into the ground.

If you clocked someone that was behind you that was trying to give you back you house keys you dropped two blocks ago I imagine they would be at minimum annoyed. I also rather doubt that you would continue beating their head into the ground once you knocked them down, but would instead be focused on running away.
by mamabearCali
Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:24 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

I really don't think this is stand your ground at all in either case. In Martin's case he had the right to stand his ground (continue home, call the cops, watch the watcher), but unless he was attacked first, he did not have the right to use lethal force on Zimmerman. In Zimmerman's case...he had no where to retreat to. He was on the ground being beaten so his is straight self defense or not self defense not stand your ground at all really.
by mamabearCali
Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:05 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

03Lightningrocks wrote:
mamabearCali wrote: Edit:
If you want to start following people around your neighborhood that is up to you. I don't have time for that nonsense.
mamabearCali wrote: Had it been me I would have followed in my car and watched. So is watching out for your neighbors looking for trouble now?

Which one is it?

I am not following any old person around. Like I said I don't have time for that. However if I see a large man acting strangly around my neighbors house if I can keep an eye on them, I will. Not inconsistent at all.
by mamabearCali
Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:25 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

matriculated wrote:
If you'll please peruse this thread and the other one on the same topic, you'll find plenty of people making a big deal of Martin's appearance, language, pot-smoking, and all the other things that make him a no-good thug (some people have actually used the word thug). In fact, one forum member was essentially spamming both threads with numerous consecutive posts on exactly that topic ( ;-) VMI). So I'm not baiting and switching anything, I'm describing what I see people engaging in: victim blaming.

You asked me to expound on what I said. If you want to argue with VMI that is fine with me. But I am not arguing on his behalf. Your bait and switch was in the argument and the subject of the argument. My subject was Mr. Zimmerman following someone acting suspicious and thus getting jumped by them. You argued back that Mr. Martin was shot because he had gold teeth. That is not the case. He was followed perhaps because of his appearance and his actions, but he was shot because he attacked another person with lethal force. Two different arguments.
by mamabearCali
Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:19 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

matriculated wrote:
A-R wrote:She saying that holding CHLees to a higher standard just because they carry a gun is similar to saying a woman was "asking for it" (being raped) because she wore a sexy outfit. It's a logical fallacy to suggest someone is "asking for it" (whatever IT may be) simply because of what they choose to legally wear, carry, etc.
I addressed the rest of this post in my previous one, but what you say there doesn't sit right with me. I obviously didn't say that Zimmerman "asked for it" because he's a CHL. He purposefully went looking for trouble and found it. What I said was, as a CHL, he should have known better than to look for trouble. Isn't avoidance one of the first and most important principles of self-defense, and isn't self-defense the reason we carry? Zimmerman ignored that principle and the rest is history.

Avoidance is one of the first principals of self defense. So is dressing in such a way that does not call attention to yourself. But just because someone does something that is slightly unwise that does not negate their right to self defense in the face of lethal force. Nor does it make them culpable for another persons actions.

I don't know that he went looking for trouble. His neighborhood has been robbed many times. It seems to me that he was trying to help his friends neighbors and himself get a good look at someone suspicious in the neighborhood. Had it been me I would have followed in my car and watched. So is watching out for your neighbors looking for trouble now?
by mamabearCali
Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:14 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

matriculated wrote:
Ahhh, excellent. Thank you for bringing that up. The problem is, you've got the actors in your analogy mixed up. I'll explain. But either way, let's say I go with the analogy as you see it: comparing Zimmerman's actions with a woman's choice of clothing is hardly...umm, analogous. Unless you really do think that if women choose to dress a certain way they're "asking for it," that doesn't make any sense.

Now here's the analogy as I see it.

Fairly often after a good looking woman wearing something less than a burka gets raped, there's a chorus of "Well look at how she's dressed" and "She asked for it" knuckle dragging-type of commentary from certain quarters of our society. Instead of blaming the rapist, they will blame the victim, because hey! Look at that short skirt, who could resist? She basically did that to her self. Who would wear something like that, after all, except for someone asking for it. What kind of character defect would make her put something like that on her body?

I see the same kind of victim blaming happening with Martin. I mean, did you see his tats and grill? And he smokes pot? And golly gee wilikers did you see the foul language the young man uses on Twitter? Who would do something like that but a no-good thug? Clearly the same character flaws that would make him do those things are responsible for him asking to be shot by going around attacking well-meaning neighborhood watchmen.
Nice bait and switch. I am speaking of the actions that led to their assaults--the woman in question and Mr. Zimmerman. I actually don't care what Mr. Martin was wearing or what was on his teeth. He was not shot for his tats or his clothes. He was shot after he (according to all the facts we have at our disposal now) attacked Mr. Zimmerman and was using lethal force on him (bashing his head into the ground). Mr Zimmerman, according to all the facts we have at our disposal now had done nothing more than follow Mr. Martin and then (according to him begin to return to his car) which though unwise, is not illegal.
by mamabearCali
Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:40 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

matriculated wrote:
mamabearCali wrote:
matriculated wrote:
One thing I've never heard of is someone looking for trouble and not finding any. It's hard enough avoiding trouble, but actively looking for it usually produces swift results. Zimmerman went looking and found some pretty quick.

Just as a general matter, I think that CHL's are supposed to be held to a higher standard. We have the ability to swiftly end someone's life attached to some section of our hip (usually), and knowing that we have this power should make us more cautious, not less. That concept clearly never sunk in with Zimmerman.

Someone else pointed this out before but it bears repeating. This is the same argument used to say "Well she was wearing a mini-skirt so she deserved to be assaulted." So what do you think, should we start charging women who attack their attackers with assault?
Huh? I honestly haven't got the first clue as to what you mean. Would you mind expounding?

He got out of his car to observe...not wise, but not illegal either. He was beat up on his way back to his car. A woman walking through a neighborhood wearing skimpy clothes, again not wise but perfectly legal, puts temptation in front of a man, and gets assaulted on the way back to her car. You could argue quite effectively that both of them "went looking for trouble" but neither did anything wrong and because of what they did got assaulted. So if the woman wearing a skimpy dress shoots the person trying to rape her should we take into consideration the clothing she was wearing and if it "provoked" the man into raping her?
by mamabearCali
Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:24 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

matriculated wrote:
One thing I've never heard of is someone looking for trouble and not finding any. It's hard enough avoiding trouble, but actively looking for it usually produces swift results. Zimmerman went looking and found some pretty quick.

Just as a general matter, I think that CHL's are supposed to be held to a higher standard. We have the ability to swiftly end someone's life attached to some section of our hip (usually), and knowing that we have this power should make us more cautious, not less. That concept clearly never sunk in with Zimmerman.

Someone else pointed this out before but it bears repeating. This is the same argument used to say "Well she was wearing a mini-skirt so she deserved to be assaulted." edited out....unnecessary beating of a horse.
by mamabearCali
Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:19 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

What you missed, 03lighteningrocks, is that following someone and watching someone to simply observe them is not illegal. Jumping someone and using lethal force against a person who has done nothing more than follow you is.

If Martin was worried that night he had many legal options. Continue on his way. Call the police. Turn around and watch the watcher. He did not have cause to use lethal force against Zimmerman (beating someones head into a sidewalk is lethal force).

If a person were to use lethal force against a person they only thought was mugger and it turned out they were trying to give them car keys back, they would be in serious hot water.


Edit:
If you want to start following people around your neighborhood that is up to you. I don't have time for that nonsense.
by mamabearCali
Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

On topic: I think we just have to...... wait for it......Stand our Ground!

"rlol" "rlol" "rlol"
by mamabearCali
Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:39 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Stand Your Ground in Danger
Replies: 396
Views: 44849

Re: Stand Your Ground in Danger

matriculated wrote:
Zooming out for a moment to take a look at the forest, there seems to be general concensus that Zimmerman acted stupidly. Even many of his defenders say that he made a foolish decision getting out of the car, following Martin, etc. My understanding is that if you do something stupid and someone ends up dead as the final result, that's called manslaughter.

About Zimmerman: unfortunately for him, I think any semblance of a normal life going forward is probably impossible. Probably the best thing that could happen to him right now is to get indicted and convicted, spend a few years in the big house, get out early for good behavior, and hope that by then nobody will remember this incident. That way he might have a chance at a normal life. He's still young, only 28. If, however, he gets acquitted, adios normal life forever. People will know who he is, he will get recognized, and there are always people out there willing to do violence if they feel the justice system didn't do its job. I'm not saying it's right, I'm saying that's reality. He'll always have to look over his shoulder for as long as he's alive. He would become the OJ of central FL (and I'm not talking about the delicious FL orange juice).
First off there is criminal stupidity (smoking a joint, possessing other people's possessions). Then there is just stupidity. Walking down the street watching someone you think is up to no good--not criminal, just stupid. Getting jumped from behind by said suspicious person as you walk back to your car is neither stupid, nor criminal, just unlucky.

Second, if you think that a conviction would be a blessing in his life--think again. It would do just what convictions do, destroy his life and his family quite possibly permanently. No job, no finances, no ability to defend himself if said crazies go after him. As for his location, he can move to many places and no one would have a problem with him. He would be just fine here in my corner of suburban central Virginia.

Return to “Stand Your Ground in Danger”