I guess my brain leans a little too much towards the suspicious side when someone uses other peoples money to overpay for something while declaring it will be destroyed and then transfering said item to a "friend" for "safekeeping". Was any money paid to the winner by the friend for the privilige of "safekeeping"?vjallen75 wrote:...Still confused as to why, if he wanted to "destroy" said firearm, why "give" it to a gun owning friend?
That this might be a preacher of "the word" performing such a dubious act is ghastly to me.