Return to “SB11 & HB910 This week....”
jmra wrote:Lots of teenagers everywhere we carry. Shouldn't be an issue.NorthTexas wrote:I heard someone (Rep. Fletcher?) talk about that. Junior Colleges sometimes have dual-credit high school students on their campuses, sometimes separated from the college students but sometimes in mixed classrooms. JCs requested extra time to figure out how to handle that.nobius wrote:It's a shame junior colleges have to wait an extra two years. Not sure what the point of that provision was.
I heard someone (Rep. Fletcher?) talk about that. Junior Colleges sometimes have dual-credit high school students on their campuses, sometimes separated from the college students but sometimes in mixed classrooms. JCs requested extra time to figure out how to handle that.nobius wrote:It's a shame junior colleges have to wait an extra two years. Not sure what the point of that provision was.
Charles L. Cotton wrote:Alma Allen has a doctoral degree!!? That is shocking and reprehensible.
Chas.
Low information voters...timtheteacher wrote:I am going to go throw up in the back yard. How the heck do these people get elected???? Pontificating falsehoods.....
Yes, early in the session I believe several universities came up with "estimates" of the financial impact of allowing campus carry. Some were in the hundreds of millions of dollars per year. Total bull.safety1 wrote:39 million dollars my foot. That number would fall under the category of abuse.
My thoughts exactly - Rep. Fletcher gave a great speech/explanation of SB11 a little bit ago, it seems as though these Dems ignored every word he said.RoyGBiv wrote:Wilfully ignorant.v7a wrote:The current Rep that's speaking against SB11 must the dumbest Rep I've heard speak this session.
Rep. Sylvester Turnerv7a wrote:The current Rep that's speaking against SB11 must the dumbest Rep I've heard speak this session.
http://www.statesman.com/news/news/sena ... ill/nmQW7/The Wall wrote:So after reading the last 3 pages on this topic I still don't know if anything was resolved today.
I can't find this on the Texas Legislature website, can you share a link?pdxmale wrote:here is the effected change they came up with.....
original:
SECTION 29. Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 411.2049 to read as follows:
Sec. 411.2049. CERTAIN INVESTIGATORY STOPS AND INQUIRIES PROHIBITED. A peace officer may not make an investigatory stop or other temporary detention to inquire as to whether a person possesses a handgun license solely because the person is carrying a partially or wholly visible handgun carried in a shoulder or belt holster.
NEW:
SECTION __. Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, is amended by adding Section 411.2049 to read as follows:
Sec. 411.2049. CERTAIN INVESTIGATORY STOPS AND INQUIRIES PROHIBITED. A peace officer may not make an investigatory stop or other temporary detention to inquire as to a person's possession of a handgun license solely because the person is carrying in a shoulder or belt holster a partially or wholly visible handgun. [FA9]
