Dave2 wrote:Fox's headline graphic makes me happy...sjfcontrol wrote:approved 23/17
...it's about TIME they catch up with the majority of Americans...millions have held him in contempt for a LOOOOOONG TIME...
Search found 3 matches
Return to “‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......”
- Wed Jun 20, 2012 4:51 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13022
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
...it's about TIME they catch up with the majority of Americans...millions have held him in contempt for a LOOOOOONG TIME...
- Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:21 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13022
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
sjfcontrol wrote:Fox is now reporting that the WH is asserting Executive Privilege
...http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/06/20/ju ... -involved/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:45 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'......
- Replies: 96
- Views: 13022
Re: ‘Fast and Furious’ Does Not Mean 'Fast and Furious'.....
...the key words are "after the election"...obummer doesn't want to be faced with asking holder to resign...or face the voters if he refuses to...so delay and drag it out...wonder what he told the Republican leaders to get them to pull back...nothing is to be taken at face value...