TexasCHLforum.com

bayouhazard wrote:Blah blah blah yourself. I was responding to these comments.

speedsix wrote:...if it were YOUR 17-year-old daughter who'd been used by a 25+year-old man, left pregnant, diseased, or broken-hearted...might you feel differently???

If she's not responsible for her own body then she's nowhere near responsible enough to operate a motor vehicle that could kill other people.

...so, then, you're in favor of changing the law? issuing her a "learner's permit"? really...nevermind..I'm not really asking questions...

bayouhazard wrote:You know. If my daughter had a fake ID and regularly went out to bars and picked up strange men and one of those men knocked her up. Well. Maybe I would be pointing fingers too.

I probably wouldn't want to blame my little girl and it would be uncomfortable to ask myself what about the way she was raised contributed to her behavior. It must be someone else to blame. I sure wouldn't want people asking why I wasn't supervising my child and keeping them out of bars and strange beds.

I know! I'll blame the men she lied to. They should have known she was lying. And the bartender should have known the ID was fake. And the men were unreasonable to assume a woman drinking in a bar was 21...at least..and...and...

...like it or not...the responsibility to know the age of the girl rests LEGALLY on the male...doesn't matter if she's a nice girl or like the one you described...so we need to quit making excuses why the "man" got locked up...or change the law...I have no sympathy for them...I managed to be responsible enough to leave the children(under 18) alone...so can the rest of 'em...

...if it were YOUR 17-year-old daughter who'd been used by a 25+year-old man, left pregnant, diseased, or broken-hearted...might you feel differently??? those laws are in place for reasons, chief amongst those the majority of citizens wanted them...
...that's why we have ages in the law to enter into a contract that's binding...the years are supposed to add maturity and common sense to make better decisions...
...laws are in place to protect decent people from those who aren't...we know they're not perfect...or always fair...but it's better to have them than not...and anyone who finds sexual pleasure in a child needs to be put out of his and everyone else's misery...so this scum they caught in the act of uploading child porn, whether he was naked or in a 3-piece suit...needs to have the full punishment of the law piled on his head...
...I'm glad that he'll likely be found a felon and lose his gun rights and voting rights...we don't need his contribution to society...

...you gotta lift up the chicken to see what she's cacklin' 'bout, man...or you may miss out on breakfast!!!

rp_photo wrote:The attempts to tie gun ownership with child pornography are predictable and pathetic.

...the FACTS that a child porn criminal is so heavily armed are alarming...just like it would be alarming to find such a large amount of weapons and ammo in a drug house...or a smuggler's den...or a bank robber's hideout...felons and guns are tied together...and pose a great danger to us all...but they'll have that all tidied up in short order...

...given the world we live in, only an idiot would not have been suspicious, finding ANY literature relating to terrorism, his travel history, and a large amount of weapons...which, after a thorough investigation, may prove to be nothing at all...we've tried the "ignoring it" route...that cost us over 3000 lives...

...a few more facts to clog the mind... http://www.ksat.com/news/Detectives-Chi ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://government.tmcnet.com/news/2012/ ... 124069.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;