I think if you were to talk to the person being sexually attacked or you were the one being attacked you might change your mind as to whether the use of deadly force is appropriate. I maintain that a sexual attack causes grave bodily harm and the use of deadly force is appropriate!duns wrote:Your point is thought-provoking. My take on it is this. A person committing a sexual assault needs to be stopped as does a person committing a physical assault but from a moral and legal point of view the level of force should not be excessive so shooting will not always be necessary, probably rarely necessary. Theft is different to physical attack on a person in that it is often a reasonable option just to be a good witness and hope the person can be arrested later. In other words, I don't see use of lethal force as an imperative when someone is making off with property (even if the letter of the law allows it). If you saw a man snatch a lady's handbag and come running in your direction, would you shoot him down? I wouldn't. I might use force (if I felt I was capable of overwhelming him) but I would not use lethal force.tacticool wrote:Sexual assault isn't a capital offense but I have no problems with anyone shooting a rapist to prevent the crime.duns wrote:It's been a long time since stealing was a capital offense.
The case in question was the theft of an A/C condenser, which apparently was already in the back of the thieves' truck. Unless the thieves were attacking me, I would not have shot them. I would have told them to unload the truck. If they jumped in to drive off, I would have used my shotgun against the truck to try to deflate a tire or put some nice identifying marks on the bodywork.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Burglars shot by owner in Denton County”
- Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:12 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Burglars shot by owner in Denton County
- Replies: 50
- Views: 7487