EEllis wrote:Check again. If the fence is unlock and not posted then you can't show that it is intended to keep someone out, kind of useless putting up a security fence that doesn't lock right, so you can't get a trespass charge on it.
Here
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district- ... 65541.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is a case in Florida. Now cops enter for totally different reasons and basicly this is about an appeal of a conviction but the part that may interest you is the court found that if you have an unlocked unposted gate and want privacy then....
I couldn't care less about FL law. We're talking about Texas. And TX law is quite clear that the fence alone is barrier enough.
EEllis wrote:Now some will complain again that cops are being treated differently being allowed to trespass but know the whole point is that it isn't criminal trespass for anyone.
Moving the goal posts again I see. I never said that the
COP was trespassing. The hypothetical Girl Scout you brought up, OTH, most definitely was. 30.05 has a specific exemption for LEOs. So while this officer(s) weren't trespassing (which I think is a bunch of bull since they were at the wrong house), they were 1) at the wrong location, 2) discharged a firearm recklessly (3 shots, 1 hit, and a 6yo boy nearby), 3) traumatized a little boy & family due to their error, 4) should be held civilly and criminally liable for their mistake.