Search found 2 matches

Return to “OC v CHL”

by RottenApple
Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:08 am
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: OC v CHL
Replies: 73
Views: 13911

Re: OC v CHL

MasterOfNone wrote:Technically, both OC and CC would affect every licensee, they would all be able to legally _____. But the practical question of which would BENEFIT the most people can only be determined by asking all of them. Personally, I am not a student but I would be more likely to carry on a campus than to OC.
:iagree:

I'm not a student either and would be unlikely to OC very often (although I would like it as an option). But I think that Campus Carry would benefit more CHLs than OC would. I'd like to see both Campus Carry and OC pass this year provided there are good bills for each and NO modifications to 30.06. But if only one can pass, then it really should be Campus Carry.
by RottenApple
Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:13 am
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: OC v CHL
Replies: 73
Views: 13911

Re: OC v CHL

C-dub wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote: But attending a high school graduation would still be a school-sponsored event. One could not carry to the graduation itself, although campus carry would allow visiting the rest of the college campus while you are there.
I'm not so sure about that in this situation. Based on Charles' and Steve's opinions that if the school function is on property the school is not in control of that may not apply. OTOH, I am there attending the graduation versus just being there when a graduation just happens to be taking place. Even if it does pass this year it will be too late for this years graduation ceremonies and will hopefully be clarified before next year's.
It's my understanding (which may be flawed) that if you are at a city owned zoo or museum and a school group shows up, you do not have to disarm, but if you are part of the school group you do. I would assume that to be the case at a high school graduation occurring at a college campus.

Return to “OC v CHL”