TexasCHLforum.com

Call me when China and India are ready to get on board. Until then, it's pointless.

IF climate change is sufficiently anthropogenic to be "fixable" via changes in human activity (I'm very skeptical), the cost of changing global behavior needs to be weighed against the benefits it might bring. How much flooding? At what cost? vs spending (less?) money on mitigating the effects of warming and being able to farm in Siberia..

Isn't it more realistic to invest in solutions to the effects of allegedly-inevitable warming (because China and India will not change, let's be realistic)?