Maybe I'm missing the place where it says it's open to civilians?nightmare69 wrote:http://alerrt.org/ofcm/CourseTypes/catalog/80
All the classes I've clicked say this...
Prerequisites: Certified Police Officer
Return to “Critical legislation for 2015”
Maybe I'm missing the place where it says it's open to civilians?nightmare69 wrote:http://alerrt.org/ofcm/CourseTypes/catalog/80
Prerequisites: Certified Police Officer
Sorry guys... I didn't intend to derail the thread...TVGuy wrote:I couldn't agree with you more. Any instance where it further clarifies existing rights are important. I know I won't get the rap, I don't want the ride either if I've done absolutely nothing wrong.Teamless wrote:I use the gun show issue:RoyGBiv wrote:As much as #5 is an annoyance, I'm surprised it's getting so many votes.
If I know a sign is unenforceable, I ignore it.
When the gun show is at Pasadena Convention Center, owned by the City of Pasadena, and they have 30.06 warnings, with police officers inside also asking you (sometimes) if you have a gun on you, etc, and threatening to arrest you if you carry past the sign, then for that reason I felt this needed to be a topic to be fixed
I cannot take the chance to be arrested, even if they have no case.
I don't have the extra money just laying around to fight the case
I don't have a bank full of money to use when I cannot work, as I am in Jail, or have an issue which now prevents me from doing my job.
There are many other instances where they wrongfully post the 30.06, KNOWINGLY. and it needs to stop.
5. Create a substantial civil penalty for governmental agencies and political subdivisions that post unenforceable 30.06 signs [HB508 in 2013];
By far.gringo pistolero wrote:Repeal of all off-limits areas for Texas CHLs (excluding federal laws)
For me, that's more useful than everything else combined.