Thanks very much for providing those references. Good stuff.Jumping Frog wrote:Bottom line, just because an armed person is now running away does not mean we can safely conclude they no longer pose an immediate threat.
![tiphat :tiphat:](./images/smilies/tiphat.gif)
Nobody (certainly not me) is suggesting this is an easy decision to be made as a matter of course. I was intending to provide a counter argument to what appeared to be a rush to say "any sign of fleeing = definitely no shoot".jbarn wrote:It does not mean to just shoot armed fleeing suspects as a matter of course.
......
I maintain there is no justification for Joe Citizen for shooting a person fleeing without property based only on the premise of what the suspect "might" do.
Here's what it comes down to for me....Certainty and risk.
How certain am I that the perp is fleeing and will not turn and fire?
Do I have the ability to mitigate risk by achieving (not just seeking, but reaching) cover immediately (immediately defined as the time it would take for the perp to change his mind, turn and fire)?
In such a situation, I'm asking myself the question...
Can I avoid shooting and not wind up with MY (or a loved ones) face in this photo frame?
![Image](http://palestinename.com/anguish21.jpg)