TexasCHLforum.com

Cedar Park Dad wrote:I demand to be entertained!

No shoving. There's plenty to go around.

tallmike wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:PLEASE take this into account. Kathy Glass, the libertarian candidate, may be a worthy person, but she has no chance of winning. None at all. The only thing she will do is take votes away from Abbot. Right now, she's not really registering in the polls, although she was showing 5% back in late October. Any points she gains will likely detract from Abbott rather than Davis.

What I hear you saying is, "don't vote for the candidate you think will do the best job, vote for the one who has the best chance of winning"

Are we any better off because we have consistently voted for R's or D's? Then why would we keep doing it?

It's a fair question you're asking.

Take a hard look at Abbott. He's not an "Establishment Republican".

And while you're at it, take a hard look at Robert Sarvis. You don't recognize the name?
He's the Left-wing-backed Libertarian spoiler that the Dems ran in Virginia to try (successfully) and drain votes away from Cuccinnelli.
Sarvis took votes from Cuccinelli that would have won Cuccinelli the race.

CBS doesn't even mention Sarvis in their wrap up, even though Sarvis garnered nearly 7% of the vote and his mere presence swung the race.: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-576 ... nors-race/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Here's the back story: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/11 ... rial-race/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

If you want someone other than Abbott, work to make that happen in the primary!!!!!!!!!

Just my $0.02