Search found 1 match

by RoyGBiv
Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:28 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: The "Utah Problem" is back in uglier clothing
Replies: 96
Views: 13452

Re: The "Utah Problem" is back in uglier clothing

Here is a slightly different angle on this issue...

I moved to TX from NC about 8 years ago. I had a NC CCW and at the time there was no reciprocity between NC and TX. Just prior to moving to TX I applied for and received a FL non-resident CHL, which was valid in both NC (where I planned to travel frequently) and TX. One license, covered most of my requirements. I eventually got a TX license last year, primarily because I started traveling frequently to Colorado, which does not recognize any non-resident CHL.

Had there been nationwide reciprocity at the time I moved to TX, I would have gladly applied for a TX license and skipped FL altogether.

What's my point?
Just like drivers licenses, I don't have any serious concerns with having to obtain a CHL from my state of residence. I don't like the expense. I'd prefer not to need a license at all. But in today's reality, I understand the "why's".

If we had nationwide reciprocity, and I only had to maintain one CHL that was valid everywhere in the country, a requirement to obtain a resident CHL when I moved from one state to another would be much more tolerable. Fix the reciprocity problem and adding a "CHL must match DL" requirement becomes less problematic and less expensive.

Return to “The "Utah Problem" is back in uglier clothing”