Search found 2 matches

by SewTexas
Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:24 pm
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: UPDATE: 1/10/13
Replies: 50
Views: 8733

Re: UPDATE: 1/10/13

texasmike wrote:
TexasCajun wrote:A person visiting from out of state would have an out of state driver's license. In most cases, the DL and the CHL would match. During routine traffic stops, I've been asked if the address on my license is correct (it alwasy is as I've usually begun the paperwork to change the address before I've moved). So establishing where someone lives isn't that difficult.
For most situations, I agree, it is not difficult to tell where someone "lives." But difficult situations do arise. For example, assume someone from Lake Charles (LA) is going through a separation and goes to live with a family member in Beaumont while trying to figure out his next step in life. The house that he owns, as well as his immediate family, are in Louisiana. But he's moved out and is staying with someone in Texas. It may be a temporary visit, or it may be permanent, depending on what he decides to do next. At what point is he domiciled in Texas? At what point does he need to get a Texas CHL?

here in San Antonio, we have so many military....these guys/gals may only be here for a year or two, many don't change car tags, drivers license, probably don't even think about CHL if they have one. Then we have the "snow birds", why not get a CHL that works in both states you call home, that may be a Texas CHL it may be whatever the other state is or it may be FL....or heaven help us you may have to get one for each state :biggrinjester: but I know I would probably avoid that if I could, just for simplicity.
by SewTexas
Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:25 pm
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: UPDATE: 1/10/13
Replies: 50
Views: 8733

Re: UPDATE: 1/10/13

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
DevilDawg wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:SB164 (Van de Putte): Providing option to have "Veteran" printed on CHL.
So long as this is OPTIONAL and only per the discretion of the veteran. To be otherwise woul be an attempt to strip our vets by doctor.
It would be optional, but I see no justification for this bill. I would unnecessarily increase DPS' workload for no benefit.

Chas.
I was talking with the husband about this and said "WHY?" his response was so that she could say "see, I did this for the veterans, and I'm pro-gun" and she did it all in one bill, she's smart! he thinks it'll pass in 15 mins, no problem, then real work can get done. My problem with it is that it when a real CHL bill comes up will the legs say "what, we passed that other bill for the vets....what more do you want?"

does that make sense?

Return to “UPDATE: 1/10/13”