TexasCHLforum.com

Looks like Toomey caved in to Bloomberg. That's why he's on board with Schumer, et al.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/10/bloom ... ng-toomey/

gthaustex wrote:I'm tired of everyone telling me I have to compromise. Every compromise has resulted in giving up more with nothing gained for my side.

No more. Ever.

In a 'compromise', both sides get something, both lose something. I see NOTHING the 2A community gains from this. And nothing that couldn't be taken back in a heartbeat.

Poldark wrote: Waiting for the NRA to F rate Toomey by sundown ?

Wouldn't hold my breath. But he needs a downgrade. And Manchin as well. How he retains an "A" rating is beyond me.

RoyGBiv wrote:

Poldark wrote:NRA response

http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/news- ... s=&st=&ps=" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Succinct and on point...

[ Image ]

Should have added:

"Based on their actions, we can no longer give an "A" rating to Senators Manchin or Toomey."

Some of this wording is scary:

A bipartisan group of senators has struck a deal to expand gun background checks to all commercial sales — whether at gun shows, via the Internet or in any circumstance involving paid advertising, according to Senate aides familiar with the talks.

So, if you post on a web board, and that board has any 'paid' (and they could REALLY stretch the meaning of that) advertising, or the web site is paid in any way, it could fall under this?

I HOPE the NRA comes out and revokes the A rating of Manchin and Toomey for this. I really do.