SewTexas wrote:that really shouldn't have made me laugh so much thank youJasonw560 wrote: Nah, it's just that I have tween twins, so I can decipher jibberish.
Search found 3 matches
- Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:34 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: UPDATE: 1/17/13
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3595
Re: UPDATE: 1/17/13
- Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:45 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: UPDATE: 1/17/13
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3595
Re: UPDATE: 1/17/13
Nah, it's just that I have tween twins, so I can decipher jibberish.RPB wrote:WowJasonw560 wrote:So under SB 182, (for example) Trinity could opt out, yet UMHB could opt in? And one could carry on the A&M Kingsville campus but not on the Santa Gertrudis (?) Academy campus?
Would there be an effect if this and HB 508 passed? Would UT-Austin have to pay a fine if the regents decided to plaster 30.06 signs all around campus, since it's a state run institution?
You must have read it AC ...After Coffee.... to understand it that well.
I had trouble focusing, I fasted 2 days for a medical thingy I had Tuesday/Wednesday and my caffeine tank is only half refilled so ...
- Thu Jan 17, 2013 2:54 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: UPDATE: 1/17/13
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3595
Re: UPDATE: 1/17/13
So under SB 182, (for example) Trinity could opt out, yet UMHB could opt in? And one could carry on the A&M Kingsville campus but not on the Santa Gertrudis (?) Academy campus?
Would there be an effect if this and HB 508 passed? Would UT-Austin have to pay a fine if the regents decided to plaster 30.06 signs all around campus, since it's a state run institution?
Would there be an effect if this and HB 508 passed? Would UT-Austin have to pay a fine if the regents decided to plaster 30.06 signs all around campus, since it's a state run institution?