Deadly force would not be warranted by vebal assualt, but remember that PC 9.04 says the production of a weapon to cause the apprehension that you will use deadly force if necessary, only counts as force...not deadly force. In this case, I feel you would be justified in producing your weapon, even though at that particular moment you would not be justified in using it.AustinBoy wrote:Thanks HotLeadSolutions but that doesnt not sound like a time when deadly force is justified.
Is deadly force justified when confronted with "Assault"?
Am I wrong?
The way it was explained to me, by a county DA is: If an officer would feel the need to draw a weapon, place yourself in his shoes...you also have the right to draw a weapon. **BUT** huge difference in drawing a weapon and pointing a weapon.
PC 9.04 -I believe- was written to give you the chance to produce your weapon BEFORE you should actually need to fire it.
PC §9.04. THREATS AS JUSTIFIABLE FORCE. The threat of force
is justified when the use of force is justified by this chapter. For purposes
of this section, a threat to cause death or serious bodily injury by
the production of a weapon or otherwise, as long as the actor's purpose
is limited to creating an apprehension that he will use deadly
force if necessary, does not constitute the use of deadly force.
The underlined portion was written -I believe- to keep criminals from using this section as a defense when they produce a weapon for illegal purposes. If you remove the underlined portion the section takes on a WHOLE new meaning.