The article says Level 2, but the letter of the bill doesn't say that. Is there an established precedent that "dual points of resistance" means Level 2?steveincowtown wrote:MasterOfNone wrote:Since they used the phrase "dual points of resistance" and not "dual points of retention," one could argue that a kydex holster with recesses that resist at the trigger guard and at the ejection port provide "dual points of resistance."
Oh wow...check out the link to the article in this thread for more info about "dual points of resistance"
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=62202" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Has there been a rash of folks taking OC'ers guns in other states? I know of one incident in VA, but that is about it.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “open carry bill filed”
- Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:10 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: open carry bill filed
- Replies: 139
- Views: 28745
Re: open carry bill filed
- Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:36 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: open carry bill filed
- Replies: 139
- Views: 28745
Re: open carry bill filed
Since they used the phrase "dual points of resistance" and not "dual points of retention," one could argue that a kydex holster with recesses that resist at the trigger guard and at the ejection port provide "dual points of resistance."
- Fri Jan 25, 2013 1:42 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: open carry bill filed
- Replies: 139
- Views: 28745
Re: open carry bill filed
Isn't this what we have today?johnferg69 wrote:Just got off the phone with Lavenders office, spoke with a staffer named Bryan.
This is what I was told;
The 30.06 wording was removed because their is a question of the constitutionality of 2 different signs for carry even if its 2 different types of carry. If one type of carry is allowed it may be unconstitutional to stop another. This is something they what to clarify and fix as the bill progresses.
The "dual points of resistance" is in reportedly to help get backing from LE agencies. Bryan stated that this one complaint last session with the OC bill. LE is concerned about people who OC being unknowingly disarmed
The unintentional failure to conceal was left in because they want complete concealment or "dual points of resistance" OC. Not lackadaisical conceal carry. This is to help enforce the difference.